Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/12
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
May 12
[edit]
Lacks a license for home country (UK). The authorship is almost certainly wrong (author is the photographer not the subject). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I was a bit confused on what to do if this occurs and referenced the subject. I think it should be deleted considering that information can't be known to prove it's acceptable for Wikimedia commons Wiiformii (talk) 03:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment Agree that UK license needed. Disagree that "authorship is almost certainly wrong"; taking a time delayed photo was fairly simple for even a dabbler in photography in the 1890s. No one else is credited. There is copy of the book online at [1]. Might well be out of copyright in country of origin, unfortunately info on author George J. Nicholls seems rather thin. Anyone with experience in searching UK census & other resources? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The source provides no indication he was the photographer. As is often the case, the uploader just put the subject name into the author line. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep A UK image from 1895 (published in a book in 1917) is PD in both the UK and USA. --RAN (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Why is it PD in the UK? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- "A photograph, which was made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1954)" There is no indication in the book that the author of the 1917 book took the image in 1895, it is anonymous. See above where you indicate that we do not know who the photographer was. --RAN (talk) 03:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per RAN above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Romanov Monarchy.svg メイド理世 (talk) 03:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Nuevo Logo de la Federación Panameña de Futbol y Los Nuevos Uniformes de la Selección Panameña del año 2024.jpg
[edit]
The photo is focused specifically on the logo, so it could be a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Taichi (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
The t-shirt has intellectual property, so it could be considered a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Taichi (talk) 03:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
The t-shirt has intellectual property, so it could be considered a derivative work of a copyrighted work. Taichi (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
The logo owns intellectual property, so it could be considered a derivative work of a work protected by copyright. Taichi (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
very bad quality, very low resolution, better file File:Diego Polo - St. John the Baptist - Google Art Project.jpg Oursana (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
به دلیل رفتار بد ویکیپدیا به خاطر اینکه یک فرد شیاد نژاد پرست به راحتی عکس های بنده را حذف می کند از صفحه روستای خودمان تمام عکس ها رو حذف می کنم و فعالیتی نخواهم داشت در چنین فضای نفرت انگیز . Alexkerner2 (talk) 05:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
This is supposedly a self-made "flag" by the uploader. Commons isn't a personal file host though and fictional flags inherently don't serve any educational value. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Aside from just not being a flag in the first place. Adamant1 (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
This is supposedly a self-made "flag" by the uploader. Commons isn't a personal file host though and fictional flags inherently don't serve any educational value. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Aside from just not being a flag in the first place. Adamant1 (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete We shouldn’t treat files in illegitimate use as immune to deletion just for the sake of bureaucracy. Dronebogus (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Based on source research in zhwiki, the SVG version of this file (File:CJZ1.svg) has been updated to correct possible erroneous flag representation. In order to completely eradicate calls that are still using this wrong file, I think this file should be deleted to make error be noticed to correct it to the correct file. Cwek (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
More up-to-date alts exist created by me. I have also split the image (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rhynchocyoninae_Phylogeny.png and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Genus_(Rhynchocyon)_Distribution-2024.png. Having this dup will lead to possible confusion as it won't ever get updated. Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 06:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
_Distribution-2024.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Info File is in use. Please delink first.--Wdwd (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: This article from PurePeople cites BestImage, Denis Guignebourg as an author https://www.purepeople.com/media/jeremy-charvet-avant-premiere-du-film_m4635152 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Most likely non-free image. The source web page unfortunately doesn't exist anymore and there are no archived versions in the Internet Archive. But the URL and the description ("taken from the press material section of his company") indicate it's only meant for press use. There's no mention of a CC license on the current website. 95.90.253.75 08:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The picture is listed with a CC license on his personal website https://titusgebel.com/gallery/ 149.40.63.155 11:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Description translates as Photograph from the collection of Avraham Shabadron, an unknown photographer, processed using artificial intelligence in Photoshop. Seems to be based on the image at https://www.nli.org.il/en/archives/NNL_ARCHIVE_AL990027886170205171/NLI which looks more like a painting. If it's a photo of someone who died in 1906 then we're a couple of years short of {{Pd-old-assumed}}; if it's a painting then we'd need to know when it was painted. Belbury (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- This is a *photograph* of a painting or image from the aforementioned collection. As noted in the original, the photographer or painter is unknown. The image I uploaded has been edited using AI, based on the photograph from the collection. Refael747 (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Do we have a date for the creation of the painting? Belbury (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The original source does not mention the date, and I couldn't find any other source that does.
- Based on a slight resemblance between the figures, I assume that if it is a painting, it is based on a partial image of the figure from Wilhelm II's voyage to the Levant in 1898 in Jerusalem. This means it happened after 1898.
- Additionally, the image only shows a birth date and a title indicating that he was still alive at the time of creation. So the date range is 1898 - 1906. Refael747 (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Do we have a date for the creation of the painting? Belbury (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Use of possibly unfree images: the first appears at https://kansallisarkisto.fi/-/kansallisarkiston-paarakennuksen-historiaa, the fourth at https://www.travelgay.com/venue/allas-sea-pool Belbury (talk) 09:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The National Archives images are available under CC BY 2.0 in Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/kansallisarkisto/albums/72157653919843743/. If the Allas Sea pool image is their own (accidentally), there are several alternatives on Commons I can switch that to. I will however wish that you do not remove this image as it has been used in This Month in GLAM and would be impossible to replace with another one. Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 11:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, attribution and the alteration to use a free image!
- The "Hacking" and "Showcase" photos aren't part of the Kansallisarkisto Flickr gallery - are they your own photos? Belbury (talk) 11:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- The rights holder has not uploaded them on Commons, it seems. If there's a problem with sharing, I will have similar images taken by myself tomorrow. – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Fictional content such as flags are outside of the project scope. -- Nutshinou Talk! 09:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
SVG version uploaded Bruce The Deus (talk) 10:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I incorrectly duplicated the same file instead of uploading a new version to the existing file Johnlexcameron (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This appears to have been published in 1994. According to COM:Netherlands, works published before 1995 are copyrighted for at least 50 years. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- The photographer gave permission to publish. SaskiaBoesveldt (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- If so, you need to prove it. Please see COM:VRT. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SS. See exif. This photo is used on a music streaming site [2]. Unlikely user own work. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by myself as an intention to fix erroneous design in File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg, when it was prohibited to upload new version. Now I successfully fixed that, so it's reasonable to delete this file. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Source video is YouTube CC-BY, but the channel owner does not appear to be the copyright holder of this photo. The video seems to be a collection of material brought from somewhere else. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't know that but video is upload more than an year ago and still not strike down for copyright violation. Anoopspeaks (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are many videos on YouTube that have not been deleted even though they violate copyright. A video not being deleted does not mean that the video is legitimate. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
A picture of the railway station that was not intended for uploading, was accidentally included among them, and does not carry any relevant information. The maker. 12akd (talk) 14:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
i dont like it Amirhtak (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment That's not a reason. COM:DICK might apply, however. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Com:Rooster may also apply. Delete. 191.126.156.248 14:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know of any such policy. Are you censoring yourself somehow? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents, duplicate File:CCDC184 Conceptual translation.pdf.
- File:Conceptual translation of Coiled-coil containing 184 CCDC184 Part 1.png
- File:Conceptual translation of Coiled-coil containing 184 CCDC184 Part 2.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The whole 2-page document is currently in use. Given the document is relatively short, I could see someone wanting to make an editorial choice to show both pages simultaneously in an article. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
no longer used 4wikin9 (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
no longer used 4wikin9 (talk) 15:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
no longer used 4wikin9 (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
No obvious educational value - Commons is not an imagebin for screenshots; see Commons:Project scope Malyacko (talk) 16:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- this capture was used as an illustration for a question on wikitech ... in fact I work on the technical part of wikimedia but if it annoys the laws you can delete it but it could have been beneficial to other technicians. Christbirego (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Photo focused on the logo, which maintains intellectual property, so it is a derivative work. Taichi (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fantasy. (Or which period are these borders representing?) Enyavar (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Kein eigenes Werk. Handelt es sich wirklich um das offizielle Wappen des Weilburger Stadtteils, so könnte die Datei gemeinfrei sein. Falls nicht, ist die Datei wahrscheinlich urheberrechtlich geschützt und zudem out of scope (erfundenes Wappen). GerritR (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
bardzo słaba jakość. Są inne lepszze zdjęcia Zwiadowca 21 18:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Fictional content is out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 19:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
The logo consists of defined curves grouped at specific angles, therefore exceeding the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
