Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/13

12 May 2024

14 May 2024

Deletion requests on 13 May 2024

May 13

File:Dm logo2 2013.png

Logo of a UK band which exceeds COM:TOO UK. File is used a fair amount on ENWP and could be re-uploaded there. Consigned (talk) 00:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Depeche Mode logos

Logos of a UK band which exceed COM:TOO UK

Consigned (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Majority of these logos, I'm pretty sure were designed by Anton Corbijn, whom is Dutch. Corbijn has worked with Depeche Mode since the late 80s. Especially for the 2010s onward logos here, I'm pretty sure were created by Corbijn. As we can see at Discogs, the credits for design go to Corbijn - [1][2][3]. It would depend on where he lived when the logos were created. If it was the Netherlands, the UK threshold might be irrelevant.
In the case it was someone else other than Corbijn, we'd need to find out who created them. The band members did not create them, but if they did UK copyright would not apply as both members live in the USA. PascalHD (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Depeche Mode - Construction Time Again - Logo.png

Logo/wordmark of a UK band that is borderline and may exceed COM:TOO UK. The current license claims PD in UK due to 25 year typographical copyright, but my reading of COM:UK is that this applies only to copyright-expired work, whereas this work would still be covered by standard 70-year UK copyright. Consigned (talk) 00:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DM Violator logo.png

Logo/wordmark of a UK band that is borderline and may exceed COM:TOO UK. Consigned (talk) 00:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is Own work of a user. It is not the same as what appears on the album cover [4]. Similar but not the same. It is just cursive writing. Probably safe to keep. PascalHD (talk) 01:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kusonje.jpg

No evidence this image is the uploader's own work. It can be found in abundance elsewhere online. [5] Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Da-se-ne-zaboravi-19.-Kolovoza-1991.-uslijedio-je-kombinirani-dugo-pripremani-pjesacko-artiljerijski-napad-Srba-na-Pakrac article.jpg

No evidence this image is the uploader's own work. It can easily be found elsewhere online. [6] Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alanasings (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unused Spoken Wikipedia articles generated en masse by text-to-speech engines (i.e. a computerized voice reading the article).

There is a rough consensus on enwiki that Spoken Wikipedia articles should be voiced by a human, not machine-generated. These versions were all removed from articles in December 2023 after users objected to their use, and voiced concerns over serious quality issues in some of the recordings (per this discussion). If consensus changes to support the use of machine-generated spoken content, these audio files can be regenerated (hopefully with fewer errors!) at that time.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus appears to be from two accounts named "Raspberry". --RAN (talk) 02:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These are useful as long as there is no button on articles that dynamically narrates the Wikipedia article using T2S for the latest version. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The severe quality issues present in many, if not most, of these recordings make them not useful, and editors on the English Wikipedia have expressed this sentiment by removing them from articles. For example, the very first file on this list, File:Creamery.ogg, mispronounces the title as "creamy" - and it only gets worse from there, with users reporting that some of the recordings mispronounce names, contain significant stretches of silence or nonsense (with one file starting with a voice saying "Test, test, test"), or include narrations of irrelevant text like infoboxes. If you want to propose that Wikipedia add an automatic TTS feature, that's a separate discussion - but these files aren't useful as they currently exist.

As an aside: these types of recordings are not useful to non-sighted users, even when they are available. Most non-sighted users use their own text-to-speech software to read text content with their own personalized configuration (e.g. typically a much higher speaking rate). Omphalographer (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Updated NCA.png

Corporate logo, not the uploader's own work. Does it exceed COM:TOO Canada? Consigned (talk) 01:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunday Night Football (51787366405).jpg

duplicate of File:Rodney Harrison 2021.jpg SecretName101 (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:22033-frente amplio logo.jpg

The logo design maintains a certain complexity and unique characteristics that are far from being a mere circle (within it has a jagged star outline and a path that represents a stylized F), so it could exceed the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 02:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mashreq-new-logo.png

Definitely not a CC file. Unsure if this can be considered to be PD-textlogo in the UAE but there is no information about TOO at COM:UAE. Suggest deleting as PCP --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пример горки в иконописи.png

Presumably this is a detail of old painting, however without info of what is it detail of and how old is it, it is impossible to apply proper license. Original CC-by is wrong Jarekt (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete The uploader uploaded quite a few images wrongly claiming "own work", such as [7] or [8]. Some of them turned out to have reasonable licenses. But the majority of them were deleted. The user appears to abandon the project. Altenmann (talk) 04:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werdauer Weihnachtsberg, Station 02, Info.jpg

Copyright text MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... The entire Category:Werdauer Weihnachtsberg seems problematic. These are indoor images, so no FOP, and the christmas exhibits are probably enough creative to be copyrighted. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erzya Parj.jpg

Copyright text MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reefer Madness (1936) by Louis J. Gasnier.webm

Colorized version includes copyright notice: © Legend Films, Inc. 2004 Mayimbú (talk) 03:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden panel and part of arch at Sonargaon Folklore Museum 2.jpg

Text not copyright-free. MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the nameplate of the artifacts in a museum, which are just names of the artifacts displayed that don't fall under literary or dramatic work. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Festividad de la Virgen de la Candelaria en Puno 2024 84.jpg

Not copyright-free. MichaelMaggs (talk) 04:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klee Benally arrested August 7th, 2012.jpg

No evidence on the linked source page that this photo was released under CC BY 1.0 as claimed by the uploader (also not in this version archived around the time of the upload). Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hassan II Mosque, Casablanca.jpg

No FOP in Morrocco. see also Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Hassan_II_Mosque --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 05:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mosque Hassan II.jpg

The main or intended subject of this is the mosque, impossible to be treated as "not the main subject," as it is the only interesting object in this photo. The mosque is authored by w:en:Michel Pinseau, and Morocco does not permit commercial freedom of panorama. Commercial permit from the heirs of the architect is needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mosque Hassan II.jpg

No FOP in Morrocco. see also Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Hassan_II_Mosque --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 05:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klee Benally at Human Rights March 2012.jpg

No evidence that this photo was released under CC BY 1.0 as claimed by the uploader. (That license is not mention on this page which was presumably the specific page on the given website that was the source of the photo, also not in this version archived around the time of the upload, or the site's About page. While the site's footer currently says "@nticopyright © 2001. Anti-colonial agitation", it is not at all clear if that is meant to be a release under other terms, or could be relied upon legally as such.) See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Klee Benally arrested August 7th, 2012.jpg (same uploader). HaeB (talk) 05:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:L'Atalante (1934)

Contains artwork by Michel Gondry for a 1990's rerelease:

File:L'Atalante (1934) par Jean Vigo.jpg and File:L'Atalante (1934) par Jean Vigo, affiche.jpg are Derivative works from the film.

As of the film itself, according to France's Copyright Law: "The authorship is granted to natural persons (co-author) that have created the relevant work: scriptwriter, author of the musical composition etc. (L.113.7)" and "a work is protected until 70 years after the death of the last surviving co-author." L'Atalante was written by Jean Vigo (1905-1934) and Albert Riéra (1895-1968), based on a scenario by Jean Guinée (unknown) and it's score composed by Maurice Jaubert (1900-1940).

Being Riéra the last surviving co-author with a known death date, the film will not fall into the public domain until at least 2031. --Mayimbú (talk) 04:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mayimbú: I guess you mean 2039 (1968 + 70 + 1)? --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden fish, human face, vishnu's vehicle at Sonargaon Folklore Museum.jpg

This file was initially tagged by MichaelMaggs as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Text not copyright-free. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the nameplate of the artifacts in a museum, which are just names of the artifacts displayed that don't fall under literary or dramatic work. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beatamancini.jpg

File:Beatamancini (cropped).jpg

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since) Krd 07:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source and author of the photo and the year it was taken are missing and therefore it is not possible to establish whether it is in the public domain. On it.wiki the same photo (where this one comes from) has been deleted due to lack of information ZioNicco (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sntshkumar750 (talk · contribs)

Low res, possible screenshots. Permission needed.

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sntshkumar750 (talk · contribs)

This user has uploaded great swathes of files which are copyright violations and/or are out of scope for other reasons, many of which have been deleted. I have selected additional files for discussion which have no camera details, usually a mobile phone here, and which appear to me to be lower resolution than either of the phones commonly employed by them. I think each of them needs examination by other eyes prior to a decision, though COM:PCP applies. Obviously proper permissions should be sent through COM:VRT, in the absence of which I doubt they should remain here. It is possible that I have included one or two in error, though I have checked with care.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Antony Church, Naravi.jpg

wrong photo Bantrugudde (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see anything wrong in the photo. Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Midjourney Dali.png

As works by Salvador Dalí (d. 1989) are still in copyright, it should be discussed whether this allegedly AI-generated image violates the copyright of Dali by imitating his painting-style. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination. First of all we are all assumed to work in good faith so I am not really happy with the word "allegedly". I asked Midjourney to generate something looking like a Dali painting and here is what I got, after a few attempts. I am indeed myself curious to see if the principle that AI generated works are PD applies here. Can any element from an actual Dali painting be spotted in this image ? Hektor (talk) 10:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I choose the term "alleged" as we/I have no means to really evaluate the true source, not out of mistrust directed at you.--Túrelio (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No, styles are not copyrighted. I don't think it's likely it will be discussed in a rational reasonable manner instead of people just voting whatever subjective opinions they have without any substantiation. You are allowed to go to some museum or public exhibition or publicly available images on the Web and get inspired from them or try to create something of the same style. It's for example why musical genres can exist instead of one artist producing something that then wards off anything else similar to it. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, see Commons:AI-generated media#Special case: intentionally derivative works. --Túrelio (talk) 12:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but you wrote imitating his painting-style as rationale. I don't see any derivative parts in this image and it would be easier to determine if the user had provided the prompt. I wouldn't object to deletion that much because the image is really bad and doesn't show the Dali style well. A better image should be uploaded and once there is one I'd vote delete because the image is not that illustrative, accurate or useful. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a derivative work of Dali's The Persistence of Memory. It's a rather bad one, as it's reinterpreted the "soft" clocks as an ordinary pocket watch, but it's still unmistakably based on that painting. Omphalographer (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete derivative of multiple elements of Dali's work, not useful for Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dubai city at night.jpg

No freedom of panorama in the UAE , sorry -- — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 12:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Allowable skyline image that does not unduly focus on any given building. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dubai's sky scrappers.jpg

No freedom of panorama in the UAE , sorry -- — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 12:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Allowable skyline image that does not unduly focus on any given building. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, centered and intentional focus on The Address Boulevard Dubai, completed in 2017 and authored by NORR Group Consultants International Ltd. (designer of the building). (authorship source). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dubai's night view.jpg

No freedom of panorama in the UAE , sorry -- — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 12:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Allowable skyline image that does not unduly focus on any given building. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, the Address Boulevard Dubai is not substantial here (only visible as incidental, protruding object at the bottom). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:OTP-Projective Geometry1.pdf

Consists only of textual content that is presented as the own work of its author and is therefore original research D.Lazard (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nervosa perpetual chaos (1).jpg

VDA suspect Sintegrity (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I'm fairly certain the uploader was a member or representative of the band, so they're authorized to release it. VRT permission would be ideal but seems unlikely given that the uploader has been indef blocked on both enwiki and ptwiki. Omphalographer (talk) 19:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Hops.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Alabasterstein as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader is not author/photographer. He became this image as a gift from Tom Hops. Unknown photographer, no permission visible, see also this dialog with the uploader (in german language): [9] Yann (talk) 13:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Well-travelled (Paul du Toit painting).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Minorax as no permission. The image was originally uploaded to enwiki by user:Planetpaul. If one examines Planetpaul's contributions and deleted contributions, it becomes extremely obvious that "Planetpaul" is Paul du Toit's Wikipedia account (although, as he died in 2014, it is not possible to directly confirm this by having him send an email to VRT).

Since the image was uploaded by its creator, I argue that the "own work" and "CC-BY-3.0" statements were valid and there is no reason to delete the image. DS (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, seems fair enough to AGF. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 05:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this also applies to File:Planet Paul (logo).gif. DS (talk) 03:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gaius Augustine

Reasons for deletion request - Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA - GaiusAugustine (talk) 13:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maronui Taimana.jpg

Hi, I'm reaching you as the person in the photo. Somehow this old photo of me ended up here and is now giving me trouble in my life. That's why I would highly appreciate the deletion of this photo. Thank you in advance, Best regards. Duximann (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madhumathi .jpg

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA.GaiusAugustine (talk) 15:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:De trap.jpg

Painting by Paul Delvaux (d. 1994), under copyright. Henxter (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is exhibited in a Museum and is therefore not permanently exhibited in a public place. Museums are closed at night. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IUML - HUMAN RIGHTS RALLY CALICUT INDIA 2023.jpg

Full version found on Al Jazeera, piracy of a photographer's work: https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2023/10/29/hundreds-of-thousands-march-worldwide-against-israeli-bombardment-of-gaza 24.51.233.149 16:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by C F Spring (talk · contribs)

Corporate logos, do they exceed COM:TOO Netherlands and COM:TOO Canada?

Consigned (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traian Chelariu.jpg

This image is too old and needs a proof the uploader is the copyright owner. Donarius (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iuri Fedkowicz.jpg

This painting is too old and needs a proof the uploader is the copyright owner. Donarius (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GRIGORE NANDRIȘ.jpg

This image is too old and needs a proof the uploader is the copyright owner. Donarius (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Langemak&Glushko Rockets....jpg

Fake PD claim, one of the co-authors died in 1989. Quick1984 (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Valerii tabakov (talk · contribs)

Enyavar (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dioroma at Sonargaon Folklore Museum 3.jpg

Not copyright-free. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the nameplate of the artifacts in a museum, which are just names of the artifacts displayed that don't fall under literary or dramatic work. Wasiul Bahar (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per reason showed by Wasiul Bahar. Mehedi Abedin 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rex Rabanye.jpg

labeled as "own work" when it is quite clearly an album cover and therefore almost certainly not a free image. Just Step Sideways (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tempelfest Hamm-2019-5803.jpg

Not copyright-free. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Эмба Манджиев Главное фото.jpg

wrong date, probably wrong author and source, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lois Ladra.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. File is COM:INUSE in eswiki, may be copyright issues though, low quality jpeg, maybe cropped from internet. Seawolf35 (talk) 18:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

La foto es originial y propia, además de contar con la correspondiente autorización del autor para su inclusión

en la página wikipedia. No tiene mucha calidad, pero cumple con todos los parámetros exigidos por wikipedia Carballa13 (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per precautionary principle as no permission. All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 19:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss-vogelod.jpg

Signature is Josef Fenneker (1895–1956), whose work would not be public domain in Germany until 2027 hinnk (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a uploader of file I agree. Back then I thought this is already public domain in Europe. OGPawlis (talk) 19:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Irrende Seelen.jpg

Signature is Josef Fenneker (1895–1956), whose work will not be public domain in Germany until 2027 hinnk (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Women House of Brescia.jpg

The author listed is producer Hubert Moest, but the poster artist is actually Josef Fenneker (1895–1956), so this will not be public domain in Germany until 2027 hinnk (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stammwappen Tschugguel.jpeg

This file was initially tagged by Jordi as no license (No license since) Reguläre LD erforderlich. GerritR (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Engels Armorial Bull.jpg

Modern sculpture, no freedom of panorama for such artworks in Russia. COM:FOP Russia 188.123.231.2 20:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polish 20240205 194105738.png

This file was initially tagged by Donarius as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted logo PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dubaideena (talk · contribs)

all the photos was taken in UAE (no freedom of panorama at all in this country) that's way I am nominating this batch of photos

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 21:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. These need to be gone through one-by-one. A fair number of these have no architectural works and so are not freedom of panorama issues at all. There are also cases with allowable skyline images not unduly focusing on any given building. Some of the images are a bit damaged in their scope because they seem to be tourist images with the posing kids. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BAPS Hindu Mandir.jpg

the photo was taken in UAE (no freedom of panorama at all in this country) Reda Kerbouche (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saudi King No Filter.png

self created artwork? something between parody and insult. Only one upload of the user, not used. Avron (talk) 21:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sharayu Sancheti (talk · contribs)

all the photos were taken in UAE (no freedom of panorama at all in this country) that's way I am nominating this batch of photos and also some of the photos are maybe uploading without permission of the persons on the photos

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 21:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. File:Jumeirah Beach with Ain Dubai.jpg is likely de minimis (and an amusement ride isn't a copyrightable building any way), but I wonder about the scope. File:Yacht through Dubai marina.jpg seems to be an allowable skyline image that does not unduly focus on any particular building. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehmet Tekin Arıburun.png

Delete The claim of own work is very dubious, and Turkish copyright lasted for 70 years at the COM:URAA restoration date in 1996, with a copyright extension from 50 to 70 years in 1995. I am not sure whether that extension was retroactive; even if not, copyright in images from after 1944 would certainly have been restored by the URAA. The subject lived until 1993 and I can see no reason that this image should have been made before 1945.Felix QW (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wedding Procession - Dinesh & Akriti Wedding.jpg

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Copyvio Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requested due to objections raised by individuals depicted in the image, citing concerns over their consent and privacy. Dineshmendhe3 (talk) 02:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the privacy is the issue, then File:Folk_Dance_during_weeding_2.jpg shows same people a few seconds apart. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC 0071 (2635897273).jpg

Blurry and not clear, absolutely unusable in any article. In addition, the file name is also sloppy.--Krorokeroro (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Requester's vote. --Krorokeroro (talk) 18:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:L'Atalante (1934

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/13

May 13

Files in Category:Depeche Mode logos

Files uploaded by Alanasings (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:L'Atalante (1934)

Files uploaded by Sntshkumar750 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Sntshkumar750 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Gaius Augustine

Files uploaded by C F Spring (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Valerii tabakov (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Dubaideena (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Sharayu Sancheti (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search