Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/16

15 May 2024

17 May 2024

Deletion requests on 16 May 2024

May 16

Files in Category:Los Angeles Unified School District

Not sure if {{PD-CAGov}} can apply to these logos. According to the template, school districts (which the logos are for) are one of the agencies in California able to claim copyright and that "any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States".

reppop^talk 00:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think at least the first one is below TOO. It consists almost only of letters. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:All That original logo.svg

Not own work, looks to be above the TOO. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 00:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by "looks to be above the TOO". I tried to give credit to where the original source came from in order for this image to placed on Wikimedia Commons. Furthermore, I feel it is important for the original All That logo to be displayed on its Wikipedia page. BradfordNewton (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Credit is only the source. It's important, of course, but the image also has to be under a license that Commons can accept, like Creative Commons, or on the public domain, like by it being too simple to copyright (called threshold of originality). Otherwise, Commons can't host it, and you'd have to go to Wikipedia itself to upload it as fair use.

Brainulator9 is saying that the image surpasses the threshold of originality (TOO) and so it isn't in the public domain. The site you cited as a source also doesn't give a CC0 notice anywhere (in fact, it states the logo is copyrighted and is being used under fair use).

You put yourself as the author of the file. If you have the copyright to this logo, contact VRT so it can stay here. Rubýñ ^(Talk) 20:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbert and Zelmyra Fisher.webp

Unreliable sourcing (Fandom) and no proof of date -- but it's probably not 1924, given their appearance. See also w:Talk:List of long marriages#Photo Incorrectly Captioned. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 01:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I corrected the date, you can just correct errors in names and dates. --RAN (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): That doesn't solve the copyright concerns, as we have no proof of publication. We also have no documented evidence to show if this is actually from the 1950s, only a guess. Otherwise I would have changed the date myself. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 22:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Generally we have relied on United States copyright case law, where an image is "made public" when it leaves the custody of the creator. We have been reserving "unpublished" where we have a provenance of an image deposited in an archive directly by the creator, such as when Getty Images buys the entire oeuvre of a photographer. Up until 1964 you had register for a copyright and then renew that copyright. Registration was required up until 1989. --RAN (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Assuming I'm reading you correctly, that definition of published is not exactly what's said at Commons:Publication#United States: "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending." Ideally, that interpretation would be documented in our policies/guidelines. But regardless, we have no idea who the creator is—they could still be alive right now! And we have no idea when the image was "published" or "made public" prior to its appearance on the Gerontology Wiki at an unknown date. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      - You are conflating United States copyright laws and Unites States copyright case law. Case law involves how the courts have interpreted United States copyright laws as written, creating a legal precedence. A rundown on case law answering the question: "When is an image made public?" has been discussed most recently here and here.
        @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I'm not a lawyer, and I can't argue the finer points of US copyrights. I rely on Commons documentation to handle that for me, and if that's the new (to me) Commons approach to copyright, it should be documented in those pages. Commons:Publication, Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States, etc. have absolutely nothing about this. You shouldn't have to point to deletion discussions to prove your point! :-) For this specific image, I'd look to Carl's comment from the first link there: "Works coming out of family archives however do have the very distinct possibility of being unpublished, so the details should be examined a lot more closely." Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - I might also note this recent village pump discussion, where Jmabel said "We would not make that assumption about amateur work by someone photographing their own relatives ..."—a line that specifically appears to apply here. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is indeed their wedding it would be 13 May 1924 per https://gerontology.fandom.com/wiki/Herbert_Fisher,_Sr. But as Ed said, that seems very unlikely: this is not a picture of two people in their late teens. They may be at a wedding, but not their own. 1950s seems plausible, maybe even 1960s. (By the way, there appears now to be a longer known marriage).

Do we know anything about first publication date of this photo? - Jmabel ! talk 05:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Not that I'm aware of. I can't find anything in the top results on Google Books, and Google image search is pretty useless because a bunch of websites have copied that photo. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 03:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some way on Fandom to see an upload date? Google Lens doesn't give one for them. Earliest thing for which Google Lens gives a date is http://robert.foo.my/2010/04/longest-married-couple-85-years-gives.html, for which it gives April 7, 2010. By the way, that gives a much more plausible dating for the photo itself of "at one of their anniversaries in the Sixties".

If we can't identify the photographer or their heirs, and we don't have evidence of publication without notice before 1 March 1989, we are probably going to have to delete this, because I don't see any other scenario where this could yet be in the public domain. "Publication" is, as noted above, a tricky word in this context. - Jmabel ! talk 04:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: The Fandom page does tell us that the uploader was the same person who created the article, and the photo was used in the article's first revision, so I would bet the photo was uploaded in 2019. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 00:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Find A Grave dates the photo to 1964 and being taken during their 40th anniversary celebration. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 00:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

40th seems very plausible, that would call for a big party. - Jmabel ! talk 05:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HistoricPasoRoblesAlmondGrowersBuilding.jpg

Photo is edited as a portion of the sky was Photoshopped to correct a lens flare; when uploading originally, I mistakenly uploaded this one out of a set which included some editing to the sky in an attempt to remove the lens flares. Would prefer to replace it with a natural photo which has not had the sky edited in Photoshop. AlmanacHobbyist (talk) 02:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kraven the Hunter (film).jpg

Not an actual logo, rather just plain text used on a social media account that has been superseded by the actual logo of the film. Not reflective of the film in any useful way. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: can't be superseded by File:Kraven the Hunter film logo.jpg. Used on w:fi:Kraven the Hunter (elokuva), w:ko:크레이븐 더 헌터 (영화), w:sv:Kraven the Hunter (film) and w:tr:Avcı Kraven (film). - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 06:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trailblazer101 did you check to see whether this image was in use, when you nominated it for deletion? Hats off to Alexis Jazz for informing us the image is currently in use on four WMF projects. Geo Swan (talk) 05:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scope is established, right, as the image is in use?
Isn't this image de minimis - too simple to be protected by copyright? So, then the only challenge would be scope.

Keep as above. Geo Swan (talk) 05:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had removed it from all uses beforehand. Must've been readded on those sites. Not all images are necessary, this one especially as its just non-defining plain text. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trailblazer101, it would be appropriate to mention you've removed existing image usage prior to your nomination. Ideally also link the pages you've removed it from. And if you claim it's superseded by another file, link which file that would be. Presumably you were referring to File:Kraven the Hunter film logo.jpg which I've nominated for deletion. Transparency is key. If your removals stick and were appropriate it won't make a difference for the nomination.
It's more than plain text. There's the font choice, text placement (centered with a large margin) and foreground and background colors (white on black). It's some official representation of the movie, having been published on the official Twitter account for the movie. For various Wikipedias, especially those without fair use, that may be considered better than nothing. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 10:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madame Web production logo.png

Not an actual logo, rather just plain text used on a social media account that was superseded by the actual logo of the film (which was since removed for copyright violations). Not reflective of the film in any useful way. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fi-sana (non-native).oga

This file is not educational as the word is mispronounced (in particular, the duration of the initial vowel is too long) Stockhausenfan (talk) 06:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't even hesitate, just do it. I was a know-no-better at college-like work then, and I am surprised no one has raised an objection to this upload until now (quite honestly, I had largely forgotten about the Finnish uploads). I hope my sounding neurodivergent did not cause a single person to believe that Finns are neurodivergent the entire time the files remained on Commons. Free Media Kid$ 14:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fi-kuu (non-native).oga

This file is a mispronunciation of the Finnish word - it contains the incorrect vowel [ʉ], while the correct pronunciation contains the vowel [u] Stockhausenfan (talk) 06:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't even hesitate, just do it. I was a know-no-better at college-like work then, and I am surprised no one has raised an objection to this upload until now (quite honestly, I had largely forgotten about the Finnish uploads). I hope my sounding neurodivergent did not cause a single person to believe that Finns are neurodivergent the entire time the files remained on Commons. Free Media Kid$ 14:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, many of us are neurodivergent :D

I don't have the ability to remove these myself so I'll wait for the deletion discussion. Stockhausenfan (talk) 20:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fi-lintu (non-native).oga

This file is a mispronunciation of the Finnish word - both vowels are too long so the word could be mistaken for "liintuu", and the u vowel uses the incorrect fronted vowel [ʉ] instead of the correct [u]; furthermore the t is aspirated instead of the correct unaspirated version used in Finnish Stockhausenfan (talk) 06:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't even hesitate, just do it. I was a know-no-better at college-like work then, and I am surprised no one has raised an objection to this upload until now (quite honestly, I had largely forgotten about the Finnish uploads). I hope my sounding neurodivergent did not cause a single person to believe that Finns are neurodivergent the entire time the files remained on Commons. Free Media Kid$ 14:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kraven the Hunter film logo.jpg

Textured logo with various glare and depth effects. For reference: source is https://www.piratesandprincesses.net/sony-releases-trailer-for-upcoming-kraven-the-hunter-movie/kraven-the-hunter-logo/ - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 06:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KBC 2023 logo.svg

The stylized K with eyes may be above COM:TOO Mvcg66b3r (talk) 07:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fi-tukka (non-native).oga

Mispronunciation of Finnish word - aspirated t and use of a central ʉ vowel which is also pronounced for an overly long duration. Stockhausenfan (talk) 07:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't even hesitate, just do it. I was a know-no-better at college-like work then, and I am surprised no one has raised an objection to this upload until now (quite honestly, I had largely forgotten about the Finnish uploads). I hope my sounding neurodivergent did not cause a single person to believe that Finns are neurodivergent the entire time the files remained on Commons. Free Media Kid$ 14:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DocPhoto Revolution soeurs.jpg

Obvious CopyVio, unless DreamcoatJoey can confirm to VRT that they own le-cartographe.net Enyavar (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Lebed 2017 postcard of Transnistria.jpg

Postage stamps of Transnistria are PD. There doesn't seem to be an exception government works in general though and there's no evidence the photograph on this postcard was created by an employee of the government anyway. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 08:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ceahjlazco1882 (talk · contribs)

DW, no author, duplicate to svg

File:Flag of Utebo.png

TentingZones1 (talk) 10:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duplex-2205-plate.jpg

Copyright violation? According to the description, the source of this photo is https://www.calicometal.net/duplex-steel-2205-plate-pipe-fittings-manufacturer-supplier.html. But I do not see a VRT ticket and the photo is not at least 70 years old. JopkeB (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мемориал 2 (Озерки, Калининский район).jpg

Возможно, наружение правил свободы панорамы: файл также загружен в русскую Википедию, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%9C%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB_2_(%D0%9E%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%B8,_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BE%D0%BD).JPG, при этом в русской Википедии добавлен шаблон, запрещающий загрузку файла на Викисклад. Либо файл в русской Википедии, либо файл на Викискладе должны быть удалены. ATI1999 (talk) 10:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:API 1104-WPS.jpg

This image show a tech form and does not look like own work by uploader, also it had existed years before uploading here. It contains some license-unclear logo and schemes. Educational value is questionable too. WindEwriX (talk) 10:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basil Zempilas Connections.png

The image has text overlaid that claims one of the living persons depicted is transphobic. Betterkeks (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't necessarily a problem, given the identity of the subject as a public figure, and their public comments as a politician. The image should be kept. 49.184.77.19 15:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a problem when it does not agree with COM:IDENT. The image defames and ridicules a person, and I doubt they would consent. That is a problem for Wikipedia. The image should be removed.

However, if the image were to be added without the text, assuming photographs were permitted at Connections at the time, it could be included in Connections (Nightclub) and even cover the matter to which you refer, but factually and respectfully without name-calling. Two wrongs don’t make a right, and I would like to think that in 2024 the vast majority of healthy humans don’t need the overlaid text to decide they don’t agree with what was said in the matter. Betterkeks (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not ‘unfair’ and so doesn’t fit under the COM:IDENT rule. 49.184.77.19 03:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The defamation and ridicule in the overlaid text is an attack on a living person. That isn't just a problem for COM:DIGNITY (to which 'unfair' doesn't apply) in COM:IDENT (and a human rights violation; see article 12 here). The text claims that the subject was transphobic (and intoxicated) at the time the photograph was taken, which seems to be sometime in 2006. Statements such as "he hasn't said these things to our faces before, so why now?" (see here) suggest he was not. Comments made by the subject in 2020 do not prove he was transphobic in 2006. Therefore the attack is unfair.

If there is legitimate evidence that the subject was indeed transphobic (and intoxicated) at that time, please provide citations to that evidence. But the proper place to make that claim and provide citations isn't in text overlaid onto a poor-quality image. Commons doesn’t HAVE to host ANY image of a person, and it shouldn't host this one as it is now. Betterkeks (talk) 04:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is pretty strange logic, the evidence you're requesting doesn't have any relevance to the fairness of the comment -today-. The fairness of the comment -today- is the only consideration with regards to the rules that you point to. I think Commons should host this image, its a good image for the Connections nightclub article. Having an image of the current mayor of Perth, partying at the club, adds value to that article. The fact it brings value to that article means we should continue to host the image here. If the image was removed from the article; then and only then should we remove it from Commons. 49.184.77.19 07:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Own work to be doubted as it was published on reddit in 2020. --Achim55 (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Delete. Work as it is currently defames and ridicules a living person. The image without the overlaid text would be suitable for use on Connections (Nightclub) as proposed by 49.184.77.19 without defaming and ridiculing a living person. By embedding the text within the image the text becomes immutable and cannot be changed. Given that the work was contributed as "own work", it should be trivial to upload it without the overlaid text. Betterkeks (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:United States Flag Map (Old).png

Same thing with the Canada file. Please delete this. Tandreasen0421 (talk) 11:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Same thing with the Canada file.[reply]

Files uploaded by Achrd (talk · contribs)

The portraits seem to be from the Constitutional Court website (https://www.mkri.id), but the website footer says all content is protected by law (© Copyright 2015 Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hak Cipta Dilindungi Undang-Undang.).

0x0a (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Gentse Opera boekbespreking.pdf

ten voordele van een ander bestand Verloren16 (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grudzien.adam (talk · contribs)

unlikely to be own work, see also deleted uploads

Didym (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Grudzien.adam (talk · contribs)

License, date, source, and author must be fixed.

File:Pocztowe Przysposobienie Wojskowe, czasopismo 1936 r..png
File:Andrzej Podgórski.jpg Keep Now fixed --RAN (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Prezydium Zarządu Głównego bierze udział w sypaniu Kopca Józefa Piłsudskiego, na Sowińcu pod Krakowem. Na zdjęciu, Prezes A. Podgórski, sekretarz Br. Kamiński i skarbnik St. Fabiniak.jpg Keep Now fixed
File:Andrzej Podgórski, więzień KL Auschwitz.jpg Keep Now fixed --RAN (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Andrzej Podgorski NAC.jpg Keep Now fixed
File:Urna z inskrypcją "Wszyscy jedziemy na tym samym wózku. Tomasz "Siwy" Wojnar. Wałbrzych 2018..jpg

Yann (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник И.Н. и М.А. Ульяновым в Пензе.jpg

No FoP in Russia for 3D, 1970 year, not own photo, fake license Lesless (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gingerbread.jpg

This redirect is no unneeded. The image it points to is only used on a user page, no actual Wikimedia public content. Nick Moreau (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/insource:/innovatechange/i

Plain text as images; uploaded solely to promote the same blog linked in each description. Each file was uploaded by different user whose sole contribution is the upload - apparently abusing multiple accounts to evade detection.

Marbletan (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SarahMallet (talk · contribs)

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the originals overwrite these FB-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, they are my photos but I have previously uploaded them to facebook. I am the owner/copyright holder 194.233.152.9 15:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahMallet: please log-in to comment. Anyway, you must upload your originals from your device. Or, if you don't have the original photos, you should follow the procedure at COM:VRTS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:MasMukedi

Multiple copyright violations, as explained below.

File:Northwest Orient DC-10 at Kemayoran Airport.jpg

It got a little blurry watermark at the bottom corner, definitely not the creation of the uploader.

File:Bandara Kemayoran tahun 1967.jpg

First uploaded by this blog on 6 October 2010.

File:Bandara Kemayoran tahun 1981.jpg

Simple Google image search would reveal that it was already uploaded to various websites before.

File:Garuda Airbus A300 Bandara Halim.jpg

Copyright by Mesquita Collection from https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9213927. The uploader cropped the Copyright notice.

File:Indonesian Airways Boeing 727 at Kemayoran.jpg

Edited photo, original photo from this website.

File:Kemayoran airport 1961.jpg

Photo by Howard Chaloner from https://www.oldjets.net/jakarta---kemayoran.html.

File:Garuda Indonesia Airbus A300 at Kemayoran Airport in 1983.jpg

It's a scene from 1983 movie Bumi Bulat Bundar. Definitely copyrighted.

Both of those are photo by Jan Koppen from https://www.oldjets.net/jakarta---kemayoran.html.

File:Bayu Air DC-6 at close site of old Kemayoran Airport in 1993.jpg

Photo by Danny Grew from https://www.airhistory.net/photo/137567/PK-BAY. The uploader cropped the Copyright notice.

File:Garuda Indonesia Airbus A300 in Kemayoran Airport.jpg

Photo by Paul Thallon from https://www.flickr.com/photos/paul-thallon/12205795086.

As for these two, there are no copyright-free nor Commons compatible license notice in the mentioned source.

--Jauhsekali (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Heyder600661

Unused, very small or low resolution files, for which better files are available on Commons (e.g. File:Brugghen, Hendrick ter - Esau Selling His Birthright - c. 1627.jpg, File:Govert Flinck - Isaac Blessing Jacob - WGA07930.jpg, File:Moses mit den Gesetzestafeln, Moses zerschmettert die Gesetzestafeln - Gemäldegalerie Berlin - 5250004.jpg). --Clarinetguy097 (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dieric Bouts - The Entombment - WGA02961 Colour adjusted.jpg

extremely false and misleading colors MenkinAlRire (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yasuke Photo.jpg

"Own work", purporting to be a photograph of someone who died around 1600 SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's an AI generated picture (therefore free of copyright), metadata have been corrected by Hyju (talk · contribs). Thibaut (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment AI images should not be employed for historical reference, please pull. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_photography for anyone who may need an extra idea of why this is clearly a fake image) 2001:1308:2DA7:1900:EC01:97BE:169A:6AD1 23:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tekin Arıburun.jpg

The claim of own work is very dubious, so the file should be assessed on the basis of its copyright status. As the extension of the copyright terms in Turkey from 50 to 70 years pma in 1995 may well have been retroactive (cf. Commons:Village pump/Copyright#URAA Restoration of Turkish works), any Turkish photogrpahs from after 1928 may well be protected by copyright in the US and should thus be deleted. As we have no information at all about the provenance of this photograph, even its copyright status in Turkey is in doubt (should it have been made by a known author who died after 1953). For what it's worth it also appeared in a Twitter post 2 years before its upload here. Felix QW (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poste électrique (1).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France. Cjp24 (talk) 16:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 Izabela Kopeć, Warsaw Poland Opera.jpg

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruudt Wackers.jpg

Author of the drawing still alive. gpesenti (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evropa Státy.jpg

Je nahraný špatný obrázek místo Evropy je nahraný obrázek asie Jaromír Petřek (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Concierto nº10 in fis moll.ogg

Possible copyvio: Did the musicians give their approval? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elipsoid.jpg

Je nahraný špatný obrázek Jaromír Petřek (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je nahraný špatný obrázek Jaromír Petřek (talk) 18:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Таггарт1.png

Suspected CopyVio: the "own work" claim is obviously false; screenshot from unidentified internet map service Enyavar (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resim 2022-08-31 161104121.png

Low quality. The photo is not useful. Kadı Message 18:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not seeing another picture on Commons where this detail is clearly visible. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resim 2022-08-31 161251938.png

Low quality. The photo is not useful. Kadı Message 18:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not useable. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 19:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giovanni Bellini - Presentation at the Temple - WGA01642.jpg

too dark, false colors, small MenkinAlRire (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellini maria1.jpg

oversaturated and false colors, small MenkinAlRire (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Présentation de Jésus au Temple (Fondation Querini Stampalia, Venise) (15162548088).jpg

too bright, false color, small, not sharp MenkinAlRire (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arminia-wappen-2021.svg

Taken from [1] Tbhotch™ 19:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Clostridium, S.Si (talk · contribs)

AI-generated clip art that can be easily replaced with existing real photos from Commons. One is used in a personal essay in the userspace.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Atashgah Castle

Poor quality and the existence of alternatives - And also the request of the uploader.

{{User|POS78}} ^talk 08:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: quality is fine, no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Atashgah Castle

Bad photos and the existence of alternatives - And also the request of the uploader.

{{User|POS78}} ^talk 22:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted 3, 4, and 5, since they were out of focus. I do not see problems with the others. Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Sculptures by Karl Ehlers

The art is exhibited in a museum and not in a public space, therefore no fop. The artist died in 1973 and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.

File:Karl Ehlers, Stele, LWL Museum Münster.jpg

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Denton Florida 1841.jpg

There is no link to the source of this file from a sockpuppet. It is not currently in use on any project page. From the description, this file may originate from "Florida Pioneers" at this website: https://fsgs.org/terms-of-use/ - which prohibits commercial use. Ooligan (talk) 23:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/16

May 16

Files in Category:Los Angeles Unified School District

Files uploaded by Ceahjlazco1882 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Achrd (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Grudzien.adam (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Grudzien.adam (talk · contribs)

Files found with Special:Search/insource:/innovatechange/i

Files uploaded by SarahMallet (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by User:MasMukedi

Files uploaded by User:Heyder600661

Files uploaded by Clostridium, S.Si (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Atashgah Castle

Files in Category:Atashgah Castle

Files in Category:Sculptures by Karl Ehlers

Navigation menu

Search