Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,449 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 49,863 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,094 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,492 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-19 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail Alter Krahnen (Trier) Detail (Attachment ring)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-19 04:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Bronze sculptures by Paolo Troubetzkoy - Amazzone
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-19 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Brunnera macrophylla (Siberian bugloss), flowers
  •  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 20:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Location information (Les Martels, Giroussens Tarn, France) is good information to be added to the image description but makes the scope too narrow. The plant is native to the Caucasus. The Les Martels floral garden happened to have an example in their collection that is being presented here. At the moment, I am thinking that the best scope for review would be "Brunnera macrophylla (Siberian bugloss), flowers" but am interested in your thoughts on the issue of native versus non-native plants. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GRDN711: ✓ Done This is a subject that has interested me a lot in the past because I have long focused on the origin of plants. But with time, and the global diffusion, then the appearance of cultivars, the natural emergence of new subspecies, I abandoned my first convictions. The only thing that really matters is the plant. In VI geographical location is not of great interest these days. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Not my subject, but I see little value in VIs of cultivars. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-19 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait de Napoléon en tenue de colonel de la Garde Nationale by Henri Félix Emmanuel Philippoteaux - Museo Correr Venice
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-19 07:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Berezivka
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Günther Frager (talk) on 2024-06-19 08:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Sara Facio
Used in:
en:W:Sara Facio
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-20 04:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Highest point Petrisberg (Trier) Above Trier.
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-20 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Thracia phaseolina (Kidneybean Thracia), left valve

 Support Useful and used. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-20 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzina Selva (Venice)- Facade on Rio dei Giardinetti
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-20 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
The Vision of Saint Anthony - Claudio Coello - Goya Museum‎ Castres France
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-20 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Hercules throws arrows at his own children, by Antonio Canova, Museo Correr in Venice

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-20 10:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe leucura (Black wheatear )
Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 10:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-20 10:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Corvus ruficollis (Brown-necked raven)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-06-20 17:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Half-opened fragile flower bud of a of Anemone nemorosa wood anemone.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-20 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Balabanivka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-21 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Corbula fortisulcata, right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-21 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Luigi Bailo - Museo 'Luigi Bailo' Treviso
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-21 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Holy bishop by Juan de la Abadia - Musée Goya‎ Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-21 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Greek antiquities in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Venice) - Funerary stele inv.291
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-21 10:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaque de cocher in Conteville-lès-Boulogne, view from rue du Centre, Pas-de-Calais
Used in:
Conteville-lès-Boulogne
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-21 10:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaque de cocher in Hermin, View from rue du Château, Pas-de-Calais
Used in:
Hermin
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-21 14:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Argya fulva (Fulvous babbler)
Thank you. I think that in this one we can see all the bird (including the foot) with a point of view that highlights the bird much more. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oke, bedankt.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-21 14:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Limosa limosa (Black-tailed godwit)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-21 14:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Sterna hirundo (Common tern)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-21 15:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Entrance to the Caspar-Olevian-Saal. sculpture next to the entrance in Trier.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-06-21 19:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Cesta Tower
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-21 20:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of 664 Soviet soldiers in Balabanivka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-21 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Calvaire de l'église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Conteville-lès-Boulogne, view from Rue du Ctre (Pas-de-Calais)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Günther Frager (talk) on 2024-06-22 01:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Chabuca Granda
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-22 04:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Baptism of the Prince of England - Storie di sant'Orsola by Tommaso da Modena- Complesso di Santa Caterina - Treviso

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-22 04:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Christ served by angels in the desert by Francisco Pacheco - Musée Goya - Castres France

 Support Best in scope. Linking to Category:Le Christ servi par les anges dans le désert (Pacheco) would be useful. --Thi (talk) 11:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-22 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Madame Récamier after François Gérard - Museo Correr Venice

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-22 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Corbula fortisulcata, left valve

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz X214 - left rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 214, en:Mercedes-Benz E-Class (W214)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacia Logan III - right front view
Used in:
de:Dacia Logan, uk:Dacia Logan
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG GLB 35 4MATIC (X247) (2023) - left front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz X 247
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Viaduc de la ligne de chemin de fer Paris-Calais (Wimereux), view from quai Alfred Hazebrouck
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2024-06-22 10:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Sava-Danube confluence
Used in:
Sava, Сава
Reason:
good shot from drone, best view so far -- Mile (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-22 11:36 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Orativ
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-22 12:05 (UTC)
Scope:
The Foucault pendulum inside the Saint Isaac's Cathedral, 1984
Used in:
en:Saint Isaac's Cathedral
Reason:
The world's heaviest Foucault pendulum was attached to the dome of Saint Isaac's Cathedral in Russia from 1931 to 1985. This is currently the only image of pendulum in Commons. There seems to be no other free images. -- Thi (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-22 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
John Locke
Used in:
en:John Locke etc.
Reason:
Cropped version of portrait of John Locke by Godfrey Kneller. Widely used in wikiprojects. -- Thi (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-22 15:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Fountain with animal sculptures. (Eagle) in Trier.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-22 21:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Chroicocephalus genei (Slender-billed gull)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-22 21:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Recurvirostra avosetta (Pied Avocet)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-23 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
15, Via Mazzanti, Verona. Commemorative plaque at the place where began the Veronese Easters
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-23 04:44 (UTC)
Scope:
The Last Judgment - Francisco Pacheco - Goya Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-23 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Athena MAN 227
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-23 08:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Renault Alaskan - left rear view
Used in:
de:Renault Alaskan
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-23 08:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz X214 - left front view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-23 08:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG GLB 35 4MATIC (X247) (2023) - left rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz X 247

 Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 15:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-23 09:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Dombunker (Wiederstandsnest Gabelweihe) de Wimereux, front-view from rue Charles Lecocq.- Pas-de-Calais
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-23 10:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Ch’ti Blockhaus d’Audresselles, view from Rue de la Mer, Pas-de-Calais
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-23 21:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Sylvia undata (Dartford warbler)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-23 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Buteo rufinus cirtensis (Long-legged buzzard)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-24 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Campo San Giacometto (Venice) - Fountain - Venice
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-24 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
The Adoration of the Magi by Alejo Fernandez - Musée Goya - Castres France
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-24 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Forze d'Ercole dei Castellani - Museo Correr Venice
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-24 02:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Confresa
Used in:
‍d:Q1805601, en:Confresa, es:Confresa
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-23 22:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Igreja São Pedro Apóstolo - Vila Rica
Used in:
‍d:Q126560002
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-23 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Palácio Araguaia (Vila Rica)
Used in:
‍d:Q126560001, en:Vila Rica (Mato Grosso), pt:Vila Rica (Mato Grosso)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-23 18:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Cachoeira do Arari
Used in:
‍pt:Cachoeira do Arari, es:Cachoeira do Arari, en:Cachoeira do Arari, it:Cachoeira do Arari,
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 24 June 2024
Scope:
Pantoporia sandaka davidsoni (Indian Extra Lascar) - dorsal
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-24 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Redunca arundinum (Southern reedbuck) female
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-24 10:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Chlorocebus pygerythrus (Vervet monkey) rear view

Unusual to suggest a scope of a rear view. There are images that would better fit the scope of male genitals.

Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review.
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"