User talk:Belbury

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Belbury.

This is the user talk page of Belbury, where you can send messages and comments to Belbury.

Be polite.
Be friendly.
Assume good faith.
No personal attacks.

Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Put new text under old text.
New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
Click here to start a new topic.

एसवी ट्यूशन

"This content is educational and not promotional. Thank you for understanding. I did not posting link to advertise but as source reference. We appreciate the efforts to uphold the community standards and ensure the quality of content on Wikimedia Commons. It's essential for all users to abide by these rules to maintain the platform's educational value. Thank you for the warning, and we understand the importance of adhering to these guidelines to preserve the integrity of Wikimedia Commons." एसवी ट्यूशन (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Cthulhu

Hi, I noticed that you nominated two images I uploaded for deletion.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Todos_teman_al_todopoderoso_Cthulhu.jpg

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sailor_Moon_fighting_against_Cthulhu.jpg

I understand that they are of low quality and that they do not serve very well to represent the subject of artificial intelligence, but I think they deserve to continue in Commons as two images that represent the character Cthulhu Strange Anomaly (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Strange Anomaly: I've put my thoughts at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Craiyon, where I was writing about a lot of unused Craiyon images on Commons rather than just these two of Cthulhu. Would be useful to get your input there if you have some thoughts on how these images are useful and should be kept. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Craiyon images

Some dozen or so of these images were specifically created as illustrations for the July 31 Signpost, which is due to publish in three hours. As such, I am currently editing the issue and preparing it for publication, and do not have the time to properly articulate myself here. The ones I have made are not being put into file categories for their subjects (i.e. "Dalmatian bench" is not in any categories for benches or Dalmatians). I will respond to the nomination in more detail later, but for the time being, I can assure you that many of these are directly relevant to a project. JPxG (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: From your talk page, it looks like only three of them were your uploads, and those three aren't in use on any Signpost drafts? I didn't nominate images any that were in use on any project. --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:49, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don't know, I just got the notification when I was popping in to check something. I will have to take a closer look later. JPxG (talk) 21:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi

i dont konw much about copyright. how can i delete my files? Crenshaw1912 (talk) 10:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Crenshaw1912: They'll be deleted automatically, soon, don't worry about it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks

Will my account be blocked after files are deleted? Crenshaw1912 (talk) 10:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Crenshaw1912: No, you're okay, Commons only blocks people if they carry on doing something after they were asked to stop. If you have questions about copyright of future uploads you can ask them at Commons:Village pump/Copyright, but basically if you've found an image online, then the site you're taking it from has to very clearly say that the image has been released as public domain (or some similar licence), you can't just upload pictures from newspapers here. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Crenshaw1912 (talk) 10:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollbacker

Hi, I gave you this right, so you can help clean these edits. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sasa_Mirkovic_u_2021.jpeg

Hello, please undelete this image, Sasa_Mirkovic_u_2021.jpeg, it is not copyright. If you check the email of wikipedia commons you will see that the image is uploaded in march of 2021. Since that news article is after in that year, it can only mean that the image was taken from wikipedia. The images in its first, is the owners sole ownership, taken from private archive, which was also confirmed in the email for copyright commons.

Please do not go arround and verify something that is not correct, just to do something in a day. Please be thorough, because this errors create a lot of problems for this kind of edits.. Regards,

Spawnjfk (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Dj[reply]

@Spawnjfk: Thanks for your response. You uploaded the image in October 2021, and the news article image is from March and at a higher resolution. I don't know what email you mean, the file didn't have an OTRS email verification template on it at the time of deletion. You can click the "you may request request undeletion" link on your talk page if you wish to the image to be restored. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cartel de Rock Bellavista

Se puede saber por que usted a declarado que es autor del cartel? Aggnet (talk) 16:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aggnet: Hi. I haven't claimed to be the author? If you are the author, see Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/es for how to confirm this. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Image Notice

According to Google, I am allowed to include an attributed Google Earth Screen shot, as long as it is attributed and meets their required. This is their commentary on it. Please, what is the issue with my image?

https://about.google/brand-resource-center/products-and-services/geo-guidelines/#required-attribution CALAYUGAN (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CALAYUGAN: Google's general guidelines for Google Earth output (https://about.google/brand-resource-center/products-and-services/geo-guidelines/#general-guidelines) are that "you’re welcome to export and use a handful of static images, with proper attribution, for non-commercial purposes such as news, blogs, educational, recreational, or instructional use."

The "non-commercial purposes" requirement is not compatible with Commons:Licensing. It's incorrect for you to upload such an image claiming it to be CC-Attribution, allowing commercial reuse. --Lord Belbury (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Angus Gill performance (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Angus Gill performance (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Angus Gill performance (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: Not sure what you're asking for here. It's a crop of a photo that the original uploader claims to be their own picture, presumably taken from a seat in the audience at a performance. --Lord Belbury (talk) 14:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged both original and cropped version. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: And what do you want me to do? --Lord Belbury (talk) 14:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is how deletion widget works. By the way, in future you could also try to match user name and credits in EXIF before making derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: Will do, I didn't think to look there, as the photograph seemed quite a mundane one. Out of interest, is EXIF generally considered sufficient for tagging no-permission? I'd usually put that kind of file up for a formal deletion discussion, on the grounds that if it was just tagged no-permission a closing admin might not realise what I was getting at and close it as keep based on the summary box claiming own work. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two other uploads on this user were album covers. User name and credit in EXIF didn't correlate in this photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko: A deletion verdict depending on other uploads seems like more reason to use a formal deletion discussion, not less! I didn't think admins were required to do that much research to close an expired no-permission, but I'm not an admin so don't fully understand the process. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete photo

Please delete File:Bauchnabelpiercing030a.jpg, reason: pornography Foundation Mathematics IVE (talk) 14:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

SCP-2000 vandalise the few pages in Chinese wiki recently

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/腰 Foundation Mathematics IVE (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, can't help you there, I'm not an admin (or even a user) on the Chinese Wikipedia. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files I uploaded

Thanks for notifying me about the deletion of the 4 files I uploaded and I fully understand it. It was wrong of me and I'll be more careful next time. EndlessKai (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crungus Images 3x3 uploaded by me

Dear Lord Belburry,

I appreciate it that you keep an eye on the uploads and so you nominated my images File:Crungus.jpg, File:Chrungus.jpg, File:Krungus.jpg, File:Grungus.jpg and File:Qrungus.jpg to be deleted because it should be Commons:Derivative works. I can assure you, it is not! I need those images to make a point inside my article draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Crungus So please could you revert your decision? Thanks a lot!

IOOI (talk) 16:14, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IOOI: Hi there. The problem is just that we don't know where you got the images from! You only say "AI generated image", which isn't specific enough: we need to be able to check that the software you used doesn't have a restrictive licence about reusing its output. If you update the file description to include the software, you can remove the {{Dw no source since}} templates. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Belbury would it be enough if I mention the app that imagery was created with https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.womboai.wombodream&hl=en&gl=US enough? I can't find any legal stuff on their website https://www.wombo.art/

IOOI (talk) 03:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IOOI: Yes, that's all it needs. Other users can decide whether the content counts as public domain or not. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Lord Belbury,

you've tagged another image as derivative work, because this image contains multiple images at once. I can assure you, that the composite image was not derived but created as it is at once, you can try this on your own, just download https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.womboai.wombodream&hl=en&gl=US or https://apps.apple.com/de/app/dream-by-wombo-ai-art-tool/id1586366816 and try yourself, just select the "Meme"-art-style for this type of multiple image and generate your own images without "deriving" work. Could you please be so kind and retract your deletion request? Thank you very much, IOOI (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IOOI: Hi again, I didn't make the link to this earlier conversation, I was just reading the article over at Wikipedia, wondered where the image was taken from and saw that the Commons page failed to specify, so flagged it up.

I see now that you tried to add a source, but in a way that didn't show up on the page in any way (the "other fields" option doesn't exist, and the {{Image generation}} template isn't meant to be used like that). I'll fix that up. --Belbury (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bement Crest

Hi there - you marked an upload of a school crest (File:Bement School Crest.png) for deletion as copyright violation. My question is how do other schools have theirs on their pages? Umass Amherst has their seal loaded up and below it says fair use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst#/media/File:University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst_seal.svg I'm new to this. Do I just have the school email permission? Thanks Ktmacc2 (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ktmacc2: Fair use is absolutely the key. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:University_of_Massachusetts_Amherst_seal.svg is a file hosted on Wikipedia itself, and Wikipedia has a fair use policy. Over here at Wikimedia Commons we don't allow fair use uploads (see COM:FAIRUSE for an explanation why).

So you can upload it to Wikipedia as fair use. Just go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard. --Lord Belbury (talk) 20:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Punk Hair by Keishii Roo.jpg

File:Punk Hair by Keishii Roo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

38.15.241.7 14:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kitbash Bloodthirster left (16098029388).jpg

Yours sincerely, — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:Screenshot-of-an-app-on-kaios.png

Hello. I've noticed the photo I just uploaded has become subject to deletion due to copyright issues. This screenshot is taken from a FOSS app. So I think its screenshot can be free as the app is? Perhaps I have to prove something? I am new to uploading anyway. --Farooqkz (talk) 16:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Farooqkz: Hello, and thanks for clarifying. The description just says "a chat app on KaiOS". I'll take the deletion template off, but you should update the file description to be clearer about what the app is and (if possible) a link to its licence in the permission= field. Belbury (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been done. Please let me know if any other change must be done as well. --Farooqkz (talk) 17:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Farooqkz: Looks fine! Thanks for updating it. Belbury (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images copyright

Hi, I uploaded 2 files recently and both were marked as copyright. What is the criteria of attributing files from Youtube because I presumed from the website [1] that Youtube allowed to use all te content. Sorry I'm a little misguided and thanks for notifying Jamal047 (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deanston OS map extract

Hi Belbury

You flagged up that you thought the Licence attribution on my use of an OS map extract from the NLS was not correct.

I replied as follows:

"This is part of an Ordnance Survey map from circa 1900, and as such it is in the Public Domain, as long out of Copyright. However it is extracted from the National Library of Scotland website, who allow reuse of material under the CC-BY licence, as long as an acknowledgement is made of the source. As such, I believe I could have put the image up simply as 'Public Domain', but as a courtesy to the NLS source it seems more correct to acknowledge them, which I have. If someone thinks the CC-BY-4.0 licence is wrong, perhaps they would like to change it? Thanks ArchaicW (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)"

But I've not heard back from you to see if you agree with this wording?

Seems to me that either the CC-BY licence or Public Domain could be correct? NLS allow reuse of their marvellous online collection of maps, as long as acknowledgment is made, but if you put it up as 'Public Domain', then a source attribution is maybe not correct!

Would be good to hear fom you, as I don't want to go ahead and use the map without being sure that the Licence attribution is OK. Thanks ArchaicW (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ArchaicW: Hello, afraid I didn't see your reply, the image wasn't on my watchlist. If the National Library of Scotland says it's CC-BY then that sounds fine, feel free to remove the problem template. Maybe add a link to the relevant page of their website in the Example text field of the Information template to make it clear. --Belbury (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, Belbury ArchaicW (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ArchaicW: No problem. And I don't know why that came out as Example text, I meant "permission="... --Belbury (talk) 15:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Belbury Thanks, I've added a link to the NLS website. I've also extended a sentence to make it clearer that the letters are added by me, the uploader, and not by the NLS. I'd quite like to remove the 'Copyright' template - but I can't see how to do it! As always, it seems with Wikipedia, there are pages and pages of "Help", but I can never find the right bit! Is it possible you could do it, or tell me what to do? I'd be very grateful. Best wishes ArchaicW (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ArchaicW: All done! Templates are the sections of the page between double curly braces, in this case it was just a matter of removing the {{Wrong licence}} from the top of the file page. Belbury (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! So simple! Must be my brain . . Many thanks! ArchaicW (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Thanks for tagging my uploads for WP:CSD. Could you check whether any of my other uploads need deletion (I've tagged G7 for one of the files) due to copyvios? I uploaded these one year ago or half a year ago and clearly was unaware of basic Commons policies, apologies for this. Many thanks for your work and help. VickKiang (talk) 00:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VickKiang: No problem. The other book cover you uploaded looks like it's probably under the threshold of originality (COM:TOO). Belbury (talk) 09:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo's death

Hello, you recently nominated a photo of my friend Ricardo for deletion which I find very disrespectful given his untimely demise. Please revert your nomination or at the very least explain why you have attempted to delete Ricardo's last photo. Thank you for your time. StarWarz1298 (talk) 20:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:RNC de Boumort.jpg

Recently you advised me about some files may be deleted (maps derivate from the Catalan ICGC repository, under CC BY 4.0 license).

It was true that I didn’t mention the origin of the map (assuming that it was under CC BY 4.0 license) and, following the advice, I added the information about “Permission (Reusing the file)”, from where the base map was taken, and the webpage that says we are free to reuse these works under CC BY 4.0.

Also I posted a note, in my discussion, explaining my steps for arrange the mistake. Then, I was confident that I did the right things and the files may not be deleted. But finally I seen that these files are deleted by User: Krd (don't care about the explanations I gave).

In my upload page I uploaded another maps, similar to the ones deleted, writing now the attribution of the base map from the beginning. I use them in the catalan Wikipedia to explain how different layers of natural protected areas can overlap between them. In order to no repeat the mistakes that I did it, the question is:

Can I upload again files like the deleted ones if I put the attribution that way?
Must be they deleted too?
Why the other files were deleted if I added the attribution of the previous work?

Thank you in advace for your attention. Gerarcalis (talk) 14:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerarcalis: Hello. Sorry to say I can't see the permission statements on the deleted files, so I can't advise on whether they were correctly stated or not, or what the problem might have been. I'd suggest taking it up with the admin who deleted them on the 13th. Belbury (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the answer, the permision are exactly the same that now I put en the other maps, currently available in my upload page: for example File:Rnc cerdanya urgell cadi.jpg, like this:

|permission=Map derived from the topographical map of Catalonia 1:25,000 from l’ (ICGC), under license CC BY 4.0”. https://www.icgc.cat/en/The-ICGC/Public-Information/Transparency/Re-use-of-the-information |Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya

It's enough with this attribution to avoid future deletions? Gerarcalis (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerarcalis: Looks okay to me. But if the other images were deleted, there may be a problem with it, I'd check with the admin. --Belbury (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I don't care too much about the old ones, if I can continue doing these little maps (doing the attribution correctly) Gerarcalis (talk) 15:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Страница википедии Копилефт защищена авторскими правами ,а картинка Копилефт не защищена авторскими правами , не кажется ли вам что это оксюморон ?

Tuong lu kim (talk) 02:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magdy Ashour.jpg

Hi, I found this picture with the same Licensing: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Khaled_Al_Gendy.png Abdelrhman 1990 (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Hi, sorry to brother you. I’d like to make map for croatian history from blank europe map, but I don’t really know how. So, I thought you can help me. – Croatia 925 (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Croatia 925: Hi, I'm not sure what kind of help you're asking for, but Category:Blank maps of Europe would be a good place to start if your previous upload was deleted for being drawn onto a map you found somewhere else online. --Belbury (talk) 12:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I’m asking for help because I don’t know how to make one. I previously tried to make a map of the Kingdom of Croatia, but without success. Is there maybe a help page? – Croatia 925 (talk) 12:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Croatia 925: Perhaps Commons:Map resources? Belbury (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupy movement handsignals diagram bank of ideas nov 2011.jpg

File:Occupy movement handsignals diagram bank of ideas nov 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Think that File:Rishabh.png is also a copyvio? Blaze Wolf (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it. Belbury (talk) 17:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images by User:Roger12725

I observe you have request deletion of one image uploaded by Roger12725 though they seem to have responded by uploading a similar image. Images appear to be for use on q:en:Lashon Byrd. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDel^t_a^c 00:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello i would like to ask if someone is dead can there photo be uploaded to commons Gerçois (talk) 20:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerçois: Not automatically, no, it still has to meet some criteria of Commons:Licensing. Ask at Commons:Help desk if you have a question about a specific photograph. --Belbury (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source on own image of TV show?

Greetings! Do I have to set the source to the file that I took on the TV by myself? For example, if I turn on an episode of South Park on Comedy Central, pause it and take a picture of the scene on the TV with my mobile phone, should I add the source or I can select the "Own work" option? – Croatia 925 ^razgovor ^– 15:22, 21 March 2023 (CET)

@Croatia 925: You should always specify the source. In the case of a photo of a TV show it would presumably have to be deleted as a copyright violation, though. --Belbury (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pin the Tail On the Donkey-example.jpg

File:Pin the Tail On the Donkey-example.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 12:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How useful?

Hi, how usefull you think is it, to marking a file twice as copyright infrigement? Lukas Beck (talk) 15:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L. Beck: Hi. Quite useful, I think? You marked it as lacking essential source material, giving the uploader a seven day grace period to identify the copyright holder and confirm that they had released it under the CC-Attribution licence that's being claimed. I could see it was a Coldplay album cover and marked it as an obvious copyright violation, so that it could instead be deleted immediately. This user has clearly just uploaded a lot of 2000s album sleeves which are obviously copyrighted. Belbury (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, unterstood! Happy Weekend! Lukas Beck (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong deletion

Dear Belbury!

He deleted the old logos of Misi YT Music and Misi YT Logo Evolution without prior notice, thereby undermining the past of Mihály Tirpák and its predecessor, the Misi YT channel family. Please take this into consideration because you do not know the channel's family history.

I will post the answer in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misiyt17 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Universe Sandbox files deletion discussion

Now, it won't be long until some of those Universe Sandbox files will be distributed through wikis, and it hasn't been solved for over a month. Where will we go? Will those files be deleted, or be kept? Power Hacks (contributions) (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Por favor, usa nombres más comprensibles para nombrar imágenes

De acuerdo lo tendré en cuenta en próximas ocasiones, de todos modos la imagen está categorizada con lo que si alguien necesita una imagen de la persona que representa, no tendría ninguna dificultad para encontrarla. En cuanto a lo que dice sobre renombrar la imagen, con un nombre más significativo, realmente no se como hacerlo. Un saludo y gracias Términus (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pile of playing cards.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pile of playing cards.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akumiro.jpg

File:Akumiro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

geoportal almaty

Привет я использовал скрины картинки с карты государственного портала , как подтвердить авторство страны Казахстан ?

Я же не буду президенту писать прошение.

Пруфы сайтов . [2]https://alag.kz/

[3]https://map.almobl.kz/

Какую карту сельского округа можно загрузить ?

На OSM получается несовпадения по координатам.

Hi, I used the screenshots of the picture from the map of the state portal , how to confirm the authorship of the country Kazakhstan ?

Questioner: I'm not going to write a petition to the president.

Which map of the rural district can I download ? Is the state Kazakhstan a corporation ?

On OSM, there are mismatches in coordinates. Tuong lu kim (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Приезидент Панасоника извинился перед инженерами СССР , за то что они украли авторские права , но инженеры СССР не могли выпускать продукцию так как (почтовый ящик) не были заточены под выпуск товаров народного потребления , это оборонная промышленность и она до сих пор не выпускает сковородки и кастрюли. В Казахстане есть только сырьевая и оборонная промышленность с пищевой , какие авторские права при отсутствии гражданских картографов . Мне грозит статья за шпионаж по 58-ой статье.

The president of Panasonic apologized to the engineers of the USSR for stealing copyrights, but the engineers of the USSR could not produce products because (the mailbox) were not sharpened for the production of consumer goods, this is the defense industry and it still does not produce pans and pots. In Kazakhstan , there is only the raw materials and defense industry with food , which copyrights in the absence of civilian cartographers . I am facing an article for espionage under article 58. Tuong lu kim (talk) 02:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here. --Belbury (talk) 07:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on Schizophrenic Day Tuong lu kim (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakhstan has no money to pay for licenses for each image.

Kazakhstan has no money to pay for certificates for each state website . Tuong lu kim (talk) 10:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand. I'll start a wider deletion discussion. Belbury (talk) 10:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Write in Russian where can I get a license if there is no inscription in the footer (basement) on the source site about the protection of all copyrights ?

There is a phone +7 727 3109 089 call Dauylbayev Yerkebulan Tuong lu kim (talk) 10:55, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the copyright violations

Hi! I'm new to Wikipedia. I am not professional or skilled and I don't know much. I am still learning how to use wikis. Recently, I got some alerts about some copyright violations which I accidently committed. I did not commit any of these copyright violations intentionally. I'm still new and I didn't know how to use Wikipedia commons properly. I have since learned and tried to fix most of the copyright violations which I accidently committed. I hope you will pardon me for my mistakes and unprofessionalism. Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar (talk) 16:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar: Mistakes are understandable! The main problem here is not that you failed to specify which websites you downloaded the pictures from, it's that these images are copyrighted. You can't upload them to Commons and state that they are CC-Attribution licenced, when the websites have not licenced them in this way. Belbury (talk) 07:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image

My image is not copyrighted. It's under fair licence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woozworlduser (talk • contribs) 15:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Beetle pitfall trap with stones.png

Copyright status: File:Beetle pitfall trap with stones.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Beetle pitfall trap with stones.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Universe Sandbox files were deleted

Well, it was a real shock that my and other Universe Sandbox files were deleted last month as not being compatible with Commons. Now, I have learnt from this lesson not to upload any more files from Universe Sandbox. If I want to upload files of space, I can upload files from other sources. Power Hacks (discussion) (contributions) 12:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Feigl and Johanna Döbereiner

Hello, I've recently uploaded headshots for Fritz Feigl and Johanna Döbereiner that I found at https://www.pas.va/en/academicians/deceased/feigl.html and https://www.pas.va/en/academicians/deceased/doebereiner.html. You've tagged these two images with a "This media file is missing evidence of permission" tag. If you check those two links and scroll to the very bottom of the page, you can see that they are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. I've tried to make this clear in the Fritz Feigl talk page, but I guess that isn't the right place to put that. Is this the right place to "provide evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license" or should I direct this statement elsewhere? Thank you BaduFerreira (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BaduFerreira: Thanks, sorry for me missing that! I've removed the templates. Belbury (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, no worries! BaduFerreira (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AutoIgor.png

File:AutoIgor.png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

GeorgHH • talk 10:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This media may be deleted.

Hi Belbury! I am new here and try to make close study of Wikipedia's rules. If i understand correct i must ask special letter-promission from the owner for all files? Thanks in advance for help! I've got this letter from you:

Thanks for uploading File:Пятерка бубен Погонщики туч.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{Permission pending}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. Pshesha (talk) 08:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limmy in 2019.jpg

File:Limmy in 2019.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G8 (page dependent on deleted or non-existent content): Parent file File:MeAndLimmy.jpg was deleted with reason (No permission since 30 June 2023)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Yeeno (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeeno: Was that initial deletion correct? Wouldn't a no-permission need some implication that the image might e somebody else's work, such as it showing up on other, older websites? I thought we took selfies at face value rather than requiring the subject to send an email confirming that it was them. Belbury (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Trump.jpg

File:Mary Trump.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No CC-BY license at source. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGifBYOrxjg help=off

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mdaniels5757.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:To The Beauty Within

The user has again uploaded image from Facebook. See File:Soumitrisha.jpg 45.64.17.3 14:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Figurine of Jew with coin (cropped).jpg

File:Figurine of Jew with coin (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 05:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

Hi Belbury! Hope you are doing well. I just made some contributions adding images primarily regarding football in Pakistan, as those articles were very incomplete, and I have uploaded plenty of images in public domain and youtube I found. It has costed me a good deal to find them, and I want the images to remain here, as I believe they are a very good addition in the wikipedia articles. Can you please review them, and please let me know if there are any drawbacks. I will try my best to sort it out. Cheers and thank you very much Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Throwawayjamal047: Try Commons:Help desk. Belbury (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You marked me as a screenshot of a screenshot an image that I uploaded as a test asking an artist if I could use a drawing of him in a wikipedia article

File:Permiso de zala77s para poner foto de Vegeta en Wikipedia.png This is not a screenshot of a screenshot.It is a screenshot of my instagram chat asking an artist for permission to upload his drawing to wikipedia

If you don't know Spanish, you shouldn't mark things as if they have copyright when they don't, nor do you understand the context of the chat or the photo, you didn't understand the title of the photo or the description that I put on the photo explaining everything, nor did you understand it. to talk to the artist in the chat and mark it as "screenshot of another screenshot

I asked librarians in Spanish using that commons image if with the permission of the artist I can upload that image that appears in the screenshot to the Vegeta article in Spanish Wikipedia, I am waiting for their response GokuJuan (talk) 14:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Express

Hello! I'm the author of this upload. Can you, please, review it and keep it, since I has updated the license? --Yeeeep nooope (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeeeep nooope: I missed this notification, but that doesn't seem to have been anything to do with me. Belbury (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chipotle fine print.jpg

File:Chipotle fine print.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

{{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 18:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dream.ai

Dream.ai has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prototyperspective (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Threats?

Are you threatening me? Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm letting you know that the film stills you uploaded are copyrighted. Belbury (talk) 15:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry It's hard I'm autistic Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What can you do to save them? Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, they're copyrighted. Commons can't host copyrighted film stills. Belbury (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I originally wanted to add them on fandom but some of the admins are corrupted and don't give a crap about people like us. Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted them to exist. Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

besides those stills are actually screenshots. Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots

If I make Screenshots just for you will you like them? Jithliouaaksuyokid (talk) 15:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, please don't upload any more screenshots of films to Commons. Belbury (talk) 15:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Michael Palin, 2023.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Palin, 2023.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Michael Palin, 2023.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Didym (talk) 15:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pop art bascule bridge, Chicago, Illinois, USA (41021626251).jpg

File:Pop art bascule bridge, Chicago, Illinois, USA (41021626251).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 12:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use you Emoji representation of the Wong-Baker scale at my facility?

Hello, and Good Morning,

I very much like your rendition of the scale over the traditional faces. Would I be able to use your Emoji representation on a introductory form in my medical facility? I unfortunately cannot give credit on the form since it will be presented to patients and distributed in the facility, but I obviously would NOT be taking credit for it either as the drawing is not my work. If this is not okay with you, I understand and please let me know. I am not opposed to creating a design myself but I rather do like your rendition. 76.75.16.80 18:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong%E2%80%93Baker_Faces_Pain_Rating_Scale#/media/File:Wong-Baker_scale_with_emoji.png 76.75.16.80 18:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can! Pretty much all of the content on Wikimedia Commons is guaranteed free for you to use. You don't need to ask anybody's permission, each file page tells you what licence it's available under.

See Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia for more information. Belbury (talk) 18:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hi, Why don't you candidate for adminship? I think you have the experience and the required knowledge. Yann (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the vote of confidence! I'm not really interested in going beyond my current level of involvement though. Belbury (talk) 10:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rosaparks (Remini enhanced).jpg

Please put your AI deletion requests in the appropriate category Trade (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Thanks, I usually do, must have forgotten in this case. We could probably bot this if we aren't already, given that AI images are usually being categorised now. Belbury (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i hate webhave to add Categories and noinclude manually. It's a complete waste of time Trade (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heart of Gaming arcade.jpg

Hi Belbury. Can you clarify why you think File:Heart of Gaming arcade.jpg has been released under a {{Cc-by-3.0}} license? There doesn't seem to be any mention of the video being released under such a license on the source url you provided when uploading this file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: You can click the "More" link where it says "5 years ago | More" under the title, to see the licence. Thanks for checking! Belbury (talk) 08:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found it. Perhaps you should add that to the file's description in case anyone tries to find the license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:40, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an unusual Vimeo page, they're all like that. Belbury (talk) 11:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PierreCollet-1966-Italie.png

Hello Belbury,

Hope you have a nice day. As I wrote about this file, I ony use Photoshop and its filters to correct or modify the pictures. I never use an A.I. application.

Best regards. Tisourcier (talk) 17:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tisourcier: Thank you for clarifying! I was in two minds about the Collet photo and couldn't find the exact frame to compare it to, but after seeing File:YvesMourousi-Toulouse-1983.png (and knowing that AI often has some difficulty with eyeglasses) I assumed you must have used some kind of AI that had taken a low resolution source and increased both image size and visible detail.

I'm not too familiar with Photoshop's available filters - is it possible that you've used the AI "neural filter" or anything like that, on these images, when increasing their resolution? Belbury (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tous mes voeux pour cette nouvelle année !
―Tisourcier

@Tisourcier: And to you! Also, do let me know what you think about the AI question above. --Belbury (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Article, New Editor...

@Belbury, Your input regarding the use of one of my photo's was a big help. Do you do any "mentor" work here on wiki? Wdallen49 (talk) 18:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wdallen49: I'm not aware of any formal mentorship system here, but if you've got any questions, feel free to ask them! Belbury (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury Thanks. The article is User:Wdallen49/Bobbie_R._Allen but I'm still working (struggling) on citations. BTW, you likely can tell from the article links but the subject is my father... Wdallen49 (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wdallen49: I just took a look at it and fixed the two citations that weren't working with this edit: [4]

You can see from the edit that you just basically had the brackets wrong, and were missing "cite web". Hope that helps! Belbury (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RE: File:Playa Popular y Rambla, Mar del Plata, 1969.jpg

Hi, Belbury. I don't know what kind of authorization I'm supposed to send via OTRS. Those pictures are from my personal archive, since they belong to my family, as well as the people who appear in them and who shot the camera. They are a family heirloom, which, to the extent they fall within the scope of Commons, I am gradually uploading. Regards, Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Banfield: Ah! If they're family that sounds fine, it was just that you'd described them as "Unknown author". I read that as meaning you'd acquired the photos perhaps second-hand and didn't know who took them, but were uploading them to illustrate the location. I'll revert the permission notices, but feel free to update the descriptions. Belbury (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer, I' ll try to be more specific with the descriptions. --Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tomahawks and War bonnets

Hi. Why did you cancel two of my edits? I will inform you beforehand that I am the author of the fundamental articles "Crown of Feathers" (that is, warbonnet) and "Tomahawk" in the Russian-language Wikipedia. That's why I know what I'm doing. In addition, it was I who put things in order (although I was sometimes interrupted) on Wikimedia Commons on the topic of crafts and household items of North American Indians (I'm not talking about anything else). Now about these two pictures. That axe is not a tomahawk from any side. This is a modern product that modern blacksmiths produce by the thousands. If you put them on Wikimedia Commons, they will completely overwhelm it. Moreover, they will fill up with their number of images of real Indian tomahawks, of which there are not so many. The author himself called his product at once a francisca, a tomahawk, a throwing axe, and a battle axe. But in reality it's just a souvenir item. At best, a tourist axe. That is, it has nothing to do with Indian tomahawks. About the headdress on a European girl with tattooed legs and lace panties. Will you not claim that this is an Indian chief, an honored warrior, or just a modern Indian? So the hat on her head is not an Indian honorary regalia, but a Chinese mass souvenir. In China and Thailand, thousands of them are produced and sold in any country. They are easily recognizable by the stripe of crosses above the forehead and by the feathers from a wide variety of local birds available to Asian producers. So think about whether you did the right thing… Сергей 6662 (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyramidcards.PNG

File:Pyramidcards.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 03:49, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion nomination of motion blur photos

You nominated some photos from the Category:Intentional camera movement for deletion but you limited the files for deletion to the photos of User:XRay. Can you explain why you are nominating all photos of one photographer on one topic for deletion but no photos of other photographers on the same topic? GPSLeo (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GPSLeo: Easily! I didn't start from that category.

I was looking through recent uploads, saw what seemed like an unusably blurred photo in there and checked the users uploads. It looked like a minority of their recent uploads had such camera movement (some alongside entirely unblurred photos of the same subject), and the older ones didn't, so I just flagged those ones for deletion. Belbury (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you checked for the users uploads you also might have seen that he is one of the most active photographers on Commons and within the ones with the most featured pictures. Why did you not ask the user on the talk page before starting a deletion request? Deletion requests for scope reasons within the most active users without prior discussion are very uncommon. GPSLeo (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't encountered that etiquette on Commons before, I'll bear it in mind. Belbury (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see you did not have any bad intentions. Do you want to keep your deletion request? If not you can just write that you want to withdraw the request on the request page. GPSLeo (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You really should have started with the assumption that I didn't have any bad intentions. I want to keep the request open, thanks. Belbury (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Observance of Labour Day in UK

Hey, you changed the UK on File:Observance of International Workers' Day RGBY.svg from yellow to green, and I just wanted to check on that - we don't have any public holiday named Labour Day, but the early May bank holiday can fall on 1st May depending on the day of the week, so we should be yellow on there? Stephanie538 (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imagenes Archivo:15DelReal.jpg

Hola No tengo ni idea que hay que hacer para demostrar que la fototografa Blanca Aldanondo cedio estas fotos del pintor. Me dio autorizacion y su correo por si quereis verificar, que acompaña a las imagenes.

Descripción Español: Pintor Rafael Del Real, de Tudela de Navarra, España Fecha 20/03/2010 Fuente Cedido por la fotógrafa profesional Blanca Aldanondo su correo por si queréis verificarlo aldamendi@gmail.com Autor Blanca Aldanondo aldamendi@gmail.com

ya me diras que tengo que hacer Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 09:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Papix: See Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/es#Autorización_de_imágenes:_¿cuándo_debo_ponerme_en_contacto_con_el_VRT? Belbury (talk) 09:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

permissions-commonswikimedia.org Gracias, se lo pasaré Un cordial saludo Papix (talk) 09:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eyes Wide Shut artwork.jpg

File:Eyes Wide Shut artwork.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Matthew - (talk) 06:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me..

I made this image and I can do and post whatever I want with it, the DeviantArt post is from MY account..

Thank you! RUI Thomas Fan (talk) 21:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 storming of the United States Capitol DSC09170 (50826699171).jpg

File:2021 storming of the United States Capitol DSC09170 (50826699171).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Trade (talk) 00:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

I'm really confused about the deletion of images. Although the images weren't mine, but I altered them and made modifications. Website "Know Your Meme" is not accessible in my own country and I originally downloaded the picture from [5], which itself is not the owner. The real owner is Ernest Khalimov (GigaChad) and you can find millions of GigaChad images on internet. Please can you undelete my images. Kazama16 (talk) 08:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kazama16: Commons only hosts freely licenced or public domain content, you'd need the photographer's permission to upload their work here, whether or not you've modified it. See Commons:Licensing. Belbury (talk) 09:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Jabberwock cw Which Dreamed It.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jabberwock cw Which Dreamed It.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jabberwock cw Which Dreamed It.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Encik Tekateki (talk) 08:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image permissions

The following images that you tagged for lack of permission,

have their CC licenses listed on their host pages. The first has no restrictions and has been checked by the Flickr bot, and the second explicitly lists CC BY 2.5. Steve7c8 (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Steve7c8: Thanks for adding a permission link on the first, I must have batched the second one up by mistake. Belbury (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also didn't realize that there is no Fair Use on Wikimedia Commons, so the rest I'll have to upload on the local English Wikipedia. Steve7c8 (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dev Anand.jpg

Yours sincerely, GaiusAugustine (talk) 08:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Nutan.jpg

Yours sincerely, GaiusAugustine (talk) 08:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

question

This has to be copyright violation right? [6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boneless Pizza! (talk • contribs) 21:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many times do I have to tell you. Screenshots, videos, and audios from YouTube are free to use. Please read this

license carefully. {{YouTube CC-BY}} Kazama16 (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this video is copyrighted. @Kazama16: YouTube content is only CC-BY licenced when it explicitly says so at the end of the information panel. This video does not. --Belbury (talk) 07:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You nominated a free image for deletion, maybe by mistake

You must have checked https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Screenshots before nominating a screenshot file for deletion.

If software is under a free license, even a non licensed screenshot is a free image. The uploaders maynot always be checking their talk page, and now commons has lost a free image.

Kindly such details before nominating further files for deletion. Deadrat (talk) 09:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deadrat: Thanks for catching this, I and the deleting admin must have both missed the fact that the software was under a free licence. Which file was this? Belbury (talk) 09:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the request

Hello, @Belbury. After some thoughts, I've uploaded the original versions of the photos finally. Now you can delete the request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:News presenters from Vietnam that you've made before.

Thank you so much. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 12:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've withdrawn the nomination. Belbury (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro?

I made them and the article would not make sense without them especially the laws in wales acts one. What should I do? Editor account 2222 (talk) 19:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Editor account 2222: All I've flagged up is File:Area transferred at some point.png which was a Google Earth screenshot (which is copyrighted to Google so we can't use it here), and another file that you said was "useless now".

What's the "laws in wales acts one"? Belbury (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok cool. laws in wales acts is the one that's flagged should I give up on it? Editor account 2222 (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wait sorry Editor account 2222 (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know which file you're talking about. Belbury (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm dumb thanks! Editor account 2222 (talk) 19:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Belbury

एसवी ट्यूशन

Cthulhu

Craiyon images

hi

Rollbacker

File:Sasa_Mirkovic_u_2021.jpeg

Cartel de Rock Bellavista

Copyright Image Notice

File tagging File:Angus Gill performance (cropped).jpg

Delete photo

Vandalism

Files I uploaded

Crungus Images 3x3 uploaded by me

Bement Crest

Notification about possible deletion

Deletion of File:Screenshot-of-an-app-on-kaios.png

Images copyright

Deanston OS map extract

Question

Ricardo's death

File:RNC de Boumort.jpg

File:Magdy Ashour.jpg

Map

Copyvio

Images by User:Roger12725

Question

Source on own image of TV show?

How useful?

Wrong deletion

Universe Sandbox files deletion discussion

RE: Por favor, usa nombres más comprensibles para nombrar imágenes

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pile of playing cards.jpg

geoportal almaty

I apologize for the copyright violations

Image

Copyright status: File:Beetle pitfall trap with stones.png

Universe Sandbox files were deleted

Fritz Feigl and Johanna Döbereiner

This media may be deleted.

User:To The Beauty Within

Image review

You marked me as a screenshot of a screenshot an image that I uploaded as a test asking an artist if I could use a drawing of him in a wikipedia article

Daily Express

Threats?

Screenshots

File tagging File:Michael Palin, 2023.jpg

Permission to use you Emoji representation of the Wong-Baker scale at my facility?

Adminship

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rosaparks (Remini enhanced).jpg

File:Heart of Gaming arcade.jpg

PierreCollet-1966-Italie.png

New Article, New Editor...

RE: File:Playa Popular y Rambla, Mar del Plata, 1969.jpg

Tomahawks and War bonnets

Your deletion nomination of motion blur photos

Observance of Labour Day in UK

Imagenes Archivo:15DelReal.jpg

Excuse me..

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

May 2024

File tagging File:Jabberwock cw Which Dreamed It.jpg

Image permissions

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

question

You nominated a free image for deletion, maybe by mistake

Delete the request

Bro?

Navigation menu

Search