Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

May 14

[edit]

Seriously doubt the copyright status of the file; looks too formal to be taken by this inexperienced, one-file-upload user. Other, copyright-free files are available anyways. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 00:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UK logo which exceeds COM:TOO UK Consigned (talk) 00:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No sources 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:F0AA:F1C0:DF4B:C587 07:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not sure what the "no sources" objection is. The map lines up with what's seen in other ones in Category:Maps of Kabylie. Is the concern that it is not the uploader's work? —Tcr25 (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

topology looks okay; but geography is a bit... off. We have actual flag maps of Europe and don't need this MS Paint version Enyavar (talk) 09:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as uneeded. All the best -- Chuck Talk 16:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

be quality slide, badly composed, there are better shots in same category. Sardaka (talk) 09:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not too terrible. It is from a whole different time than the other ones. Maybe you'll overwrite it with a better quality scan sometime? -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The map cited as source ekladata is historical and displays an entirely different thing than this map; which is based on Post-WW2 boders and thus is inaccurate Enyavar (talk) 09:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request by uploader; duplicate of File:A Review of Various Actions by the FBI and DOJ in Advance of the 2016 Election.pdf Ich (talk) 10:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected CopyVio: Satellite maps cannot be "own work" Enyavar (talk) 10:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is not own work / official logo  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to the claim of the custom PD-because tag used by this file showing a 1947 stamp from Ecuador, stamps are not in the public domain in Ecuador, see Commons:Stamps#Ecuador. In general, Ecuador has a copyright term of 70 years pma, so while a 1947 work could be in the public domain, but we'd need some evidence that this stamp is in the PD both in Ecuador and the US. Else the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 11:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There are three pictures here. One declaration of own work for a collection of images is not enough to show ownership of the uploader. 186.175.179.167 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Why not? These images where obviously taken by the same person at the same time. There's no rule that says that the images of a collection must be individually licensed. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep nominator clearly doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Dronebogus (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

تصویر تکراری Hrahaei (talk) 12:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Insignificant price tag image cropped from image File:HK MK 旺角 Mongkok 彌敦道 601 Nathan Road 創興廣場 Chong Hing Square shop 小米之家 旗艦店 XiaoMi Store December 2021 SS2 04.jpg Мункач Варош (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The text is not original enough, {{PD-text}} applies. TheImaCow (talk) 19:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The same as File:HK MK 旺角 Mongkok 彌敦道 601 Nathan Road 創興廣場 Chong Hing Square shop 小米之家 旗艦店 XiaoMi Store December 2021 SS2 05.jpg Мункач Варош (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The text is not original enough, {{PD-text}} applies. TheImaCow (talk) 19:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep These files are different, this one shows the price in June 2022, the other one in December 2021 — NickK (talk) 21:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Duplicate if File:Samsung Galaxy W (GT-I8150) front 1.jpg Мункач Варош (talk) 12:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


copyvio, the photo of the framed painting is taken from jocund database, following commons policy third parties photographs may only be used when they are two dimensional, see the text of the used PD-art tag; as this file is three dimensional and cannot be published and is not covered by the provided license, see also Art. 14 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Copyright_in_the_Digital_Single_Market, see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs Oursana (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, out of scope personal album style vanity image. We are not a depository for personal spam images. Acabashi (talk) 12:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wahyuwahono94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected Copyvio: satellite maps cannot be "own work"; two of the images have a copyright claim "Image (c) 2024 Airbus"

Enyavar (talk) 13:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PK-LMN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, no EDUSE.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:MelvL 2月2日 (6807067477).jpg as in scope of Danbo. File:MelvL (13950212253).jpg as in scope of Olympus cameras. Rest delete as per nom and as uploader request :) PK-LMN (talk) 14:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. NB: MelvL (13950212253).jpg is not a duplicate, hence it has been kept. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PK-LMN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:TOY. These subjects are based on fictional robots from Gundam. --IDCM (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Terrymwalsh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Assumed copyvio- clearly scanned from existing publicity material or other printed sources, and unlikely to be uploader's own work as claimed.

If there is any other legitimate reason these can be retained (e.g. expired copyright), I'm happy to accept that. However, it's the uploader's responsibility- or that of anyone else who wishes to argue against the deletion- to add the correct information which should have been included in the first place.

Ubcule (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

only shows "No matching data" Prototyperspective (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Beliag29 (talk) 09:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on sr:Црноврата мухарица. Under COM:INUSE that makes it ineligible for deletion on grounds of otherness. --bjh21 (talk) 10:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 04:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of copyright google map MPF (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note additionally that this file is no longer in use on sr:Црноврата мухарица - MPF (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File related to a deleted article on Italian Wikipedia, out of COM:SCOPE Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 15:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author as per metadata, VRT needed https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected GoogleMaps CopyVio: low-resolution, but the street labels are visible. --Enyavar (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The factual accuracy of this image has been disputed with {{factual accuracy}} tag, because the concepts are loosely explained: "While not being very wrong it is still false when describing these large-scale stances." The layout is good, but the educational value of the image is limited. -- Thi (talk) 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Prototyperspective: do you have opinion? --Thi (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the format is good and such an image contrasting these three related stances is and was needed. However, the implementation/execution isn't good as one can infer from the issues pointed out. In addition the image for naturalism may not represent it well and may not be CCBY. So I think the best solution would be to create a new version of this image which is accurate and useful. If that isn't done then I'd be for  Delete. You could create an entirely new image with the same concept or modify this image in some image editor to at least replace those texts (probably also the image for naturalism). Thanks for making this DR, could you edit the image? More explanatory infographics (btw the more graphics and the less text the better) about these three and philosophy would be useful, most WMC content is just photos and images are especially rare in this area. I don't know why organizations like Humanists International or whoever else doesn't do anything about it. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment. My photo editing skills are not good enough. This file can be deleted. --Thi (talk) 16:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I`m the author of this image, and i dont want to share this picture. Robsergar (talk) 16:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soy el autor de esta imagen, y no autorizo su uso bajo ningun concepto. Esta imagen tiene derechos de autor. El autor de esta imagen es Sergio García Pedroche. Robsergar (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Taken from Argentina.gob.ar 200.39.139.17 21:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work? 186.173.148.129 17:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete appears numerous times on web. Source unclear but would seem to family photo taken just before Jack family's disappearance. Certainly not the Uploader's Own Work as claimed and more than likely plucked from one of the numerous websites. --Headlock0225 (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an own work, made in the police dept. Read the Story in En Wikipedia, before being deleted, it's quite interesting... 186.173.148.129 17:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blurry and not clear, absolutely unusable in any article. In addition, the file name is also sloppy.

And also:

File:DSC 0084 (2654855941).jpg
File:DSC 0085 (2654856075).jpg
File:DSC 0086 (2655681542).jpg
File:DSC 0087 (2654856345).jpg

I am the author and uploader and I no longer want the file/work to be avaliable publicly. Possible non-educational content. Žaltář (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio (c) Laila Pfaettisch M2k~dewiki (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: likely AI-generated image of a desert (moon has no features, and its phase is inconsistent with scene lighting) Omphalographer (talk) 17:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1)

Fandom wikis tend to take a fast-and-loose approach to copyright, especially in relation to images. I don't think there's any credible reason to suspect that they can offer a license to it. Omphalographer (talk) 02:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Kind of ironic given that Wales is the current president Trade (talk) 18:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Това не е реклама. Това е истинския вид на книгата. Според мен трябва да. Остане. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.25.47.50 (talk) 06:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement by non-contributor. Till (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

commercial advertising (with watermark), see also other product ads by this uploader 2A01:599:742:CAA9:ADCC:CAB5:57A1:2810 19:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

commercial advertising (with link), see also other product ads by this uploader 2A01:599:742:CAA9:ADCC:CAB5:57A1:2810 19:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

commercial advertising, see also other product ads by this uploader 2A01:599:742:CAA9:ADCC:CAB5:57A1:2810 19:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archival photo from over a century ago - clearly not the uploader's own work. A source is needed to determine whether it is eligible for {{PD-Vietnam}}. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep circa 1910, the railroad was discontinued in 1915. --RAN (talk) 02:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): PD-Vietnam requires 75 years since publication or 50 years postmortem; without an author or proof of pre-1950 publication, it is not valid. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It is a postcard, and postcards are published material. --RAN (talk) 04:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's an unusual aspect ratio for a postcard, there's no visible edges that show it's postcard material, and the staining at bottom is more typical of a glass plate than a postcard. What makes you sure it's a postcard? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The aspect ratio and edges are based on whoever scanned and cropped the image. You can say the same for any image where you cannot see the edge. Postcards tend to have descriptive text, as does this image. I could see arguing that it remained unseen by the public if we found it in a commercial archive like Getty Images, that buys historic images directly from photographers. Postcards also have numbers on the image, so they can be reordered. We do not have enough examples to find the exact publisher, most likely French, since the text is in French, from when it was French Indochina. We have examples of over 50 French postcard publishers. --RAN (talk) 03:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

commercial advertising, see also other product ads by this uploader 2A01:599:742:CAA9:ADCC:CAB5:57A1:2810 19:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

commercial advertising 2A01:599:742:CAA9:ADCC:CAB5:57A1:2810 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

contains non-free logos 178.37.205.142 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

contains non-free logos 178.37.205.142 19:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

la foto non è di Leon Bouly, ma di Leon Gaumont https://www.gettyimages.it/detail/fotografie-di-cronaca/leon-gaumont-circa-1892-picture-at-100th-fotografie-di-cronaca/966286008 Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that this is PD-old-70; the page does not mention the photographer or author, nor any attempt to find them. This is not PD-1996, either; it was clearly under copyright in France until at least 2005, and thus had its copyright restored by the URAA. Prosfilaes (talk) 19:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Danawiki2024 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional lowres material copied from http://vasaproiect.ro/portofoliu.html

Gikü (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening,
The pictures you are referring to have been uploaded from the website of the company Vasa Proiect, for which this wikipedia page was designed. These pictures were taken by Vasa Proiect and should be admissible on Vasa Proiect's Wikipedia page.
We would appreciate it if they are kept on the Vasa Proiect Wikipedia page.
Thank you! Danawiki2024 (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gikü Pozele si logoul apartin firmei Vasa Proiect, de aceea au fost luate de siteul Vasa Proiect. Pagina de Wikipedia a fost creata pt Vasa Proiect. Puteti sa imi explicati de ce este o problema utilizarea unor imagini care ne apartin? Danawiki2024 (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

similr https://www.marubun.co.jp/corporate/history/ . eien20 (talk) 21:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no longer fulfils a clear purpose; and no clear reason to retain marked historical  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as own work, but is the logo of a financial company with clear copyright notices oin its website [1]. Only use was on a now-deleted spam page on en.wp. Just Step Sideways (talk) 22:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding it on behalf of the company (Geneva Financial), we are working on creating our own Wiki page and have declared everything as a possible conflict of interest. If the original .AI file is needed I can provide that. GenevaFinancial (talk) 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By uploading it here as your own work under a public domain license, you are explicitly saying that anyone can use this image for any purpose they like and you no longer have exclusive claim to it. Are you sure that's what you intended to do? Just Step Sideways (talk) 23:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal AI-generated image, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 22:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal AI-generated image, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 22:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Image of non-notable uploader, not in use. Themightyquill (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Image of non-notable uploader, not in use. Themightyquill (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Image of non-notable uploader, not in use. Themightyquill (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

non-free software screenshot Carl (talk) 22:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings by Léon De Smet (died 1966), not in public domain before 2036.

Henxter (talk) 22:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely project rep; no usage outside old sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage outside userpage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]