Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/17
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
May 17
[edit]
Informações incorretas a respeito do licença fornecida. Jpgr123 (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete Where is the evidence that the Flickr account is the author of this work of art? BTW O follower, so probable Flickr license washing. Yann (talk) 09:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Recorded using a list generated using the French Wiktionary. But it is a vandalism on the French Wiktionary Lepticed7 (talk) 07:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Rosa Maria Claramunt Vallespçi Afarran66 (talk) 09:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
weil die Datei eine ungeklärte Autorschaft besitzt Artemesia (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Same file than File:Alexandre Hache et Michel Metery.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamshid.parsi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from the internet.
HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Painting with unknown author and publication information, no proof of being in public domain. It has been used as a depiction of varoius people on the internet including Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Sanā'ī Ghaznavi, Rashid ad-Din Sinan, etc. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File with unknown author taken from a blog in 2013, no proof of being in the public domain per Iranian law. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aquayemi-Claude23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like a private political/environmental campaign, Not used. I doubt commons is the intendet place for this.
- File:Hungary for Action.jpg
- File:ClimateStrike.jpg
- File:ClimateChange.jpg
- File:Climate Strike.webp
- File:Climate Tech Strike.jpg
- File:GCBR and TCSL.jpg
- File:Climate Strike Fridays For Future.jpg
- File:Climate J Sign Board.jpg
Avron (talk) 12:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Not the actual logo used on air; may be a homemade copy by a noncompliant user Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- It aired on the real station! BMarGlines (talk) 12:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, this is funny because I live like 2 hours from Columbia, Missouri. Also, does station identifications on KOMU-DT3 count as an reason to show that its real and not an fake logo? Mer764Wiki (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal file, wrongly uploaded by me. Out of scope of Commons Navarretedf (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal file, wrongly uploaded by me. Out of scope of Commons Navarretedf (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal file, wrongly uploaded by me. Invented flag. Out of scope of Commons Navarretedf (talk) 14:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused personal file, wrongly uploaded by me. Redundant (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caduceus2.svg) Navarretedf (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan Malik Nursultan B (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Although the government email states that symbols or emblems that are formulated according to law are interpreted as not being subject to copyright under Article 9 of the Copyright Act, this image's description page fails to specify the particular law that substantiates this claim, thus the {{PD-ROC-exempt}} claim is invalid. Wcam (talk) 14:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wcam: It is actually clearly specified, "《法務部及所屬機關出版作業要點》附表一". —— Eric Liu（Talk） 16:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ericliu1912: Thanks for clarifying. It would be nice if you could provide a link to the official source so that the community can verify that the symbol comes from a law or regulation document. Wcam (talk) 20:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Logo obsolète. Merci de supprimer ce logo car les gens l'utilisent à tort. Guillaume Landry Head of Design @ manager.one 83.142.151.206 15:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicidade de arquivo MARCOS NAGHETTINI (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal file, wrongly uploaded by me. Out of scope of Commons Navarretedf (talk) 15:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Zweifelsfreie Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - richtig ist. Es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 1989 verstorbenen Malers Udo Scholz. Lutheraner (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Zweifelsfreie Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - richtig ist. Es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 1989 verstorbenen Malers Udo Scholz. Lutheraner (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Zweifelsfreie Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - richtig ist. Es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 1989 verstorbenen Malers Udo Scholz. Lutheraner (talk) 16:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Zweifelsfreie Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - richtig ist. Es handelt sich um ein Werk des erst 1989 verstorbenen Malers Udo Scholz. Lutheraner (talk) 16:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not an indication of release under CC-0 HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Escribiéndote23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flickrwashing account - for example, File:Valeria Zeas.jpg uploaded to both Flickr and Commons 17 May 2024 (what seredipity!) despite being here 2014. Variant of File:Valeria Zeas, ex jugadora de Tenis de Mesa en Ecuador.jpg was here before Flickr upload and appears part of a batch credited to Luis Lema (≠ Escribiéndote23 or Nase Lino), and File:Toma de Ayahuasca Achuar.png has as its subject the purported author (copyright vests in the photographer, not subject), and was similarly elsewhere prior to Flickr upload.
Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright dubious - this image was found in 2015 on various stock sites (uploader claims this was taken 2019), but they are down and no photographer info seems listed https://tineye.com/search/7cd38eef4f01d5f8ab0de7a2addcbf7d5538aa0e?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unknown copyright status: it is the COA of w:pl:Związek Sybiraków; that it is a photograph is irrelevant Altenmann (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- but relevant is the date 1939. Lowdown (talk) 11:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Licensing section states it's in the public domain as per the threshold of originality, but I doubt so: the background is not trivial, in my honest opinion. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:087 Dia Mundial de la Sida, tapís a la façana de la Generalitat, pl. Sant Jaume (Barcelona).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyright term in Spain is 70 plus years after the artist's death and it's questionable that they even have FOP to begin with, but if they do it doesn't include temporary works anyway. So this image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This was previously discussed, inconclusively, at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:AIDS Memorial Quilt. - Jmabel ! talk 22:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Yes, I am familiar with the precautionary principle, but this feels like copyright paranoia to me. - Jmabel ! talk 22:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: The question is, COM:FOP Spain is more closely a question whether such usages are violating COM:L or not?
| “ | Commercial use of the work must be allowed. | ” |
This was once discussed on VPC but, IMHO of IMHO, 
No consensus: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/08#NO-FOP_in_Spain? (for the record, COM:FOP Taiwan is a closely-like panorama which consensus is rule it Not OK for non-buildings)
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The main façade of the Generalitat Palace, the seat of the Catalan government, usually displays elements related to notable events on specific dates. This AIDS Memorial Quilt is shown in the picture because that day it was hanging from the balcony; if not, it would be a detail photograph of the central part of the Renaissance façade, with the balcony, the windows and the niche of Saint George. --Enric (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Enric Still, FOP Spain question above is still pending responds. Bumping at VPC? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Neutral I would rather suggest re-opening a VPC discussion on modification of COM:FOP Spain, too much of grey legal areas. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I'm pretty sure there were a couple of discussions about it at VPC months ago that never went anywhere. Your free to start another one, but just don't be surprised if it doesn't help. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 The most important question (where can be accounted everywhere, not only VPC) is that, whether COM:FOP Spain allows commercial reproductions or not? Still, I can't see any consensus on this question. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not really. Since even it did the law would still require the work be "permanently located" at the place regardless and this clearly isn't a permanant work. So the whole question of if they allow for commercial usage or not is just a distraction. As it would be copyrighted either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 The most important question (where can be accounted everywhere, not only VPC) is that, whether COM:FOP Spain allows commercial reproductions or not? Still, I can't see any consensus on this question. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: I'm pretty sure there were a couple of discussions about it at VPC months ago that never went anywhere. Your free to start another one, but just don't be surprised if it doesn't help. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This is a logo. Uploader claims to be the creator, but no evidence is provided. —Bkell (talk) 22:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This is a logo. Uploader claims to be the creator, but no evidence is provided. —Bkell (talk) 22:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
