Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/19

18 May 2024

20 May 2024

Deletion requests on 19 May 2024

May 19

File:Ángela Barco.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Mentxuwiki as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: La imagen es de Matilde Cherner, según el artículo de prensa. La fuente utilizada, además, tiene copyright. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image is of Matilde Cherner and is PD. The filename has been fixed, we fix errors of identification, not delete. I have no idea what the font complaint is about. "The image is by Matilde Cherner, according to the press article. The font used is also copyrighted." --RAN (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Throne of Cards IV, April 2017 16.jpg

Hearthstone image too big to be de minimis. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 01:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanoi climate data.png

I would like to delete this file about the climate graph/data of Hanoi because I no longer need it and this file is now considered redundant. Power Hacks (discussion) (contributions) 02:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. At the time of creating the logo I cropped the image only as the svg version was not available. This can be deleted. Pasaban (talk) 08:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:সে - রবীন্দ্রনাথ ঠাকুর (page 3 crop).jpg

better cleaned version available as File:Visva-Bharati University logo.svg Bodhisattwa (talk) 04:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 鹽田 Yantian 深鹽路 Shenyan Road 壹海城 One Mall shop 潮品挈尚 July 2023 Px3 03 dolls.jpg

COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 鹽田 Yantian 深鹽路 Shenyan Road 壹海城 One Mall shop 潮品挈尚 July 2023 Px3 05.jpg

COM:TOYS メイド理世 (talk) 06:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 蓮花西站 Lianhua West Station concourse artwork July 2023 Px3 02.jpg

No Freedom of panorama of 2D works in China. メイド理世 (talk) 06:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nokia621 (talk · contribs)

Nokia621 recently uploaded a photograph they claimed as own work that previously appeared in a TikTok video from 2023. As such, I don't think their own work claims have any credibility, and while these photographs are widely used on sister projects, per COM:PCP I think we need to consider them copyvios unless Nokia621 can provide an adequate explanation at the relevant undeletion requests thread for the situation.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info Nokia621 requested speedy deletion of File:Justin Bieber 2021.jpg (diff); I declined (too old for COM:CSD#G7). @Nokia621: you are welcome to respond/explain here. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed, going through the list, that that particular photo simply isn't used anywhere, so it seems to serve no purpose. I've taken a lot of photos, but only need ones that are pertinent to the public to stay up. Nokia621 (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only the ones that you actually took could ever stay up. You have no credibility right now. Bedivere (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's all of them. I thought G7 allowed for the author to have choice over their images at all times, even if already put on the platform. Please excuse the confusion. Nokia621 (talk) 21:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete These images clearly weren't taken by the same person or the uploader. I could go into why, but I think its obvious enough without needing a long winded analysis. Although I agree that people ahouldn't generally make unfounded accusations about other users, but there's clearly multiple reasons to doubt the claims being made here by Nokia621 about where the images came from. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Author had NOT previously posted those images on other social media platforms, as evidenced by unfindable reverse searches, unlike the Eras photo which the author admittedly did previously post on their own social media. Nokia621 (talk) 14:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You said "You will not find a reverse Image search because I took it and wanted it on Commons" at the UNDEL for File:Taylor Swift The Eras Tour.png, and now you're saying "the author admittedly did previously post on their own social media". Are you saying that you're not the author? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm speaking in third person about myself, who is the author, to avoid confusion for people who aren't reading my username as I added my own comment. Apparently, it's creating more confusion. Nokia621 (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, but reverse image searches aren't the be all end all to this. There's plenty of instances where an image won't show up in a search but still be uploaded from somewhere else on the internet. If your willing to humor me I do have a couple of questions about a few of the files though. With File:Max Miller.png the person is clearly at exactly the same position he would be in if he took the shot himself from a laptop or tablet. Whereas in both File:Becir Omeragic.jpg and File:Mike Faist.png they taken from about the same angle and it's pretty clear their arms were up at the time like they were holding a cell phone or something. So did you give them your camera to take the picture themselves or were you just super close to their face while they had their arms on your shoulders while taking the photograph in both images? --Adamant1 (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auguste and Louis Lumière restored.jpg

Not his own work, see https://archive.org/details/lumierebrothersc0000calz/page/n3/mode/2up Giovanni Cardinali (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xiaomi HyperOS light logo.svg

Duplicate Мункач Варош (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Duplicate of what? I don't see anything identical in Category:Xiaomi HyperOS logos — NickK (talk) 21:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 羅湖 Luohu 羅沙路 Luosha Lu 蓮塘口岸 Liantang Port 蘭亭國際名園 Lanting Guoji Mingyuan mall GLC Cinemas films list May 2024 R12S 01.jpg

No Freedom of panorama of Text in China. メイド理世 (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Hendrickx en het Calvinisme in Vlaanderen.pdf

Staat integraal op Internet Verloren16 (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hedimin (talk · contribs)

multiple reasons:

very low resolution images.
Claimed to be "own work" by the uploader
- own work seems unlikely, so suspected CopyVio
- IF really own work, then the artwork is an irrelevant personal drawing, and the map is also unusable for any purpose because it cannot be read.
File:Карта Візантійської Імперії.png
File:Хрестові походи здивували турків.png

Enyavar (talk) 09:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:USS Pickaway (APA-222) log books

Individual pages of multi-page text document. Already uploaded as PDF (File:Pickaway (APA-222) - September 1956 - DPLA - 2ac9529e3e2c19be07e3b71317645f0b (page 1).pdf), which is the preferable format. The individual page files are therefore redundant.

TheImaCow (talk) 10:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{vk}. Separate pages allow for a faster non-linear search of the contents and aid categorization. -- Ooligan (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No and no, both statements are factually wrong. The PDF file has the text embedded - go to the PDF and you are able to search within all 122 pages directly by using CRTL+F. Embedded text is not possible with JPGs (and even if, it is not present/and even if, you would have to open 122 individual files to search)
122 seperate files instead of one aids categorisation? There is no realistic reason why any categories should differ on any of the 122 pages. So you need 122 times the effort when maintaining the categorisation for absolutely no demonstrated benefit.
A document is called "document" for a reason, and it's pages belong together, into a document file format, not an image file format. Even casually trying to read this document using the JPGs is a major pain, as categories start with page 10,100,101...109,11,110.. instead of 1,2,3..., and there is no convenient way to go from page to page. TheImaCow (talk) 16:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundant. Something isn't working with these uploads. Apparently there are issues affecting millions of files: phab:T343131#9887951. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Interior of the Kunstmuseum Stuttgart

FoP in Germany only applies for exterior views and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years. Interior Staircases are explicitly mentioned as for what does not count with FoP in Germany. The buildings architects Hans Rascher and Sebastian Jehle are still alive.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Ok for me (Kunstmuseum-Stairs.JPG). I ignored this rule for Germany. Sorry. Salix (talk) 10:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ballon décorer d'un visage.jpg

no encyclopedic value, just a random low quality picture. F (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scaled Izydor Hołubowicz (-1911)-photo-processed~3.jpg

And also version Andros64

File:Izydor Hołubowicz (-1911).jpg.

Цей химерно спотворений портрет людини є відвертим знущанням над особистістю! Це нереальне обличчя Сидора Голубовича! Не можна толерувати такі обробки портретів і використовувати їх у статтях у просторах Вікіпедії для ілюстрацій у статтях про осіб! Микола Василечко (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CCCProposedArmsFull.png

Errant upload, the arms have not been officially proposed yet, was for a sandbox project but did not think it would be uploaded proper to Wikimedia more widely. PKWCurtis22 (talk) 13:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zdzisław Gozdawa.jpg

Copyvio, no proof of PD in Poland. 87.205.47.55 13:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ssimbaa (talk · contribs)

I suspect these images are copyright violations. Images are claimed to be from 2024, but many have been previously published in https://www.maritimebank.com.kh/uploads/userfiles/file/EngPAR2020.pdf, a 2020 annual report. Some have also been published in https://maritimebank.com.kh/news-detail.html?name=Lok%20Oknha%20Heng%20Sithy%20donated%20USD100,000%20to%20the%20Cambodian%20Red%20Cross.

MKFI (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zangilan Mosque 01.jpg

It has been uploaded: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zəngilan_Cümə_Məscidinin_əsas_fasadı.jpg White DemΩn (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:מוישי הגר.jpg

Not in-use picture of an unknown teenager. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 14:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:חרבות-ברזל.png

An image of a pin for a garment, whose creator and copyright status are unknown. According to the text (in Hebrew), it is implied that the uploader of this pin (and additional pins, in additional files he uploaded), is interested in selling this set of pins. Wikimedia Projects are not a marketing-advertising medium and there is no place for such an image in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 14:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:מצדיעים לנופלים - חרבות ברזל.png

An image of a pin for a garment, whose creator and copyright status are unknown. According to the text (in Hebrew), it is implied that the uploader of this pin (and additional pins, in additional files he uploaded), is interested in selling this set of pins. Wikimedia Projects are not a marketing-advertising medium and there is no place for such an image in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 14:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schlafzimmer 1.jpg

Not educationally useful Markus13666 (talk) 15:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is. It shows how a bedroom in Germany looked like in 2022, which is trivial for many of us now, but will be much less trivial in 20 years. Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:1958 in Trier

A medal released in 1958 in Germany is still protected there; the basic copyright term in Germany is 70 years (pma), and 1958 is less than 70 years ago. No author's name is immediately present on the medal itself, but that does not mean that it is anonymous in a legal sense. In Germany, it is enough that an author is somehow known for their works to enjoy a copyright term of 70 years pma. And for a medal like this, for a 1000-year anniversary of a well-known monument in a city, the medalist/sculptor is likely to have been named and published at some point.

But even if the artist's name never became known, that does not mean we can treat this as an anonymous work under German law, because pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored 70 (+ 1) years pma if the artist's identity and year of death can be found; else in 2079 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}.

Rosenzweig τ 16:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Rosenzweig, kannst Du bitte etwas näher erklären, warum eine Hunderte Jahre alte Medaille – selbst wenn es eine Nachbildung sein sollte – nicht fotografiert und das Foto nicht veröffentlicht werden darf? Sei bitte so nett und ziehe Deine Löschanträge zurück. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spurzem: Wieso denkst du, diese Medaille sei "Hunderte Jahre alt"? Nach allen Informationen, die vorliegen, ist sie von 1958. --Rosenzweig τ 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es war nicht der richtige Ausdruck: Es ist ein hunderte Jahre altes Motiv, das auf der Medaille nachgebildet ist. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Und? Deswegen wird die Medaille nicht automatisch gemeinfrei. --Rosenzweig τ 20:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep die menschliche Darstellung ist ewig alt, der Rest sieht ebenfalls danach aus. Deshalb kann das keine SH haben, die Medaillen sind gemeinfrei. Ralf Roletschek 10:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The design on both faces of the coin follow older motifs, but contains sufficient individuality to merit protection under German copyright law. --Gnom (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Нагрудный знак «Доброволец Донбасса» (гуманитарный).png

Missing EXIF, found elsewhere, uploaded by the serial copyright violator. Quick1984 (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of medals uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

The photos are not self-created. All files here have the only copyright tag {{PD-RU-exempt}}. This copyright tag may apply to the medal design, but it not applies to the photographic reproduction of the medal, except where the photographic work is included in an official document of administrative nature. For the photos we require a correct source and a written permission from the photographer.

Martin H. (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Leave as is! Most of the presented files of my own photography and image processing state awards and are immune. Георгий Долгопский (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove. Spent a lot of time and effort to the editor. Tell me what is better to use a license? Георгий Долгопский (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non. Unless it is your own photo you cant upload the files here. And many of this are not your own photos. --Martin H. (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- Yes, many pictures are not mine, but they are edited, transformed, changed colors and they are very different from the original.

Please leave pictures, otherwise I will have no incentive to continue the theme of regional medals.Георгий Долгопский (talk) 05:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is possible to remove some unedited photos posted in the right column.Георгий Долгопский (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and bas-relieves.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Просьба администраторам перенести фотографии в руский раздел википедии под лицензией {{FoP-Russia}}. С уважением. Георгий Долгопский (talk) 14:37, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan for buildings, sculptures and artistic monuments. We need the artist's or architect's, respectively their heir's permission to publish these pictures under a free licence! Commercial use must be possible! See also Deletion requests/Files in Category:Baikonur city.

Ras67 (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Violation COM:FOP Russia

Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; sadly. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Violation COM:FOP Russia / Ukraine

Maxinvestigator (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

These are not drawings as uploader claimed, but photos of 3D objects. Even if the object itself is PD, the photos must be freely licensed. No sources provided to verify this. The uploader has blocks for mass copyright violations.

Quick1984 (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 04:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia ^Semi-retired 14:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Another set of derivatives of copyrighted artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture. Uploaded immediately after the pvevious ones were deleted.

Quick1984 (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xiaomi HyperOS logo.svg

Duplicate Мункач Варош (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Duplicate of what? I don't see anything identical in Category:Xiaomi HyperOS logos — NickK (talk) 21:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Xiaomi HyperOS Logo.png has an enlarged version and better quality compared to this file --Мункач Варош (talk) 09:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Мункач Варош: This is just wrong. One should never delete an SVG file to replace it with a PNG, SVG is a vector format and can be scaled to any quality, including bigger than File:Xiaomi HyperOS Logo.png (say, 10 000 px) — NickK (talk) 18:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then tell me how to convert File:Xiaomi HyperOS Logo.png in the format SVG, because this file is of better quality? --Мункач Варош (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Мункач Варош: Help:SVG — NickK (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redmi Logo.png

Duplicate Мункач Варош (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RIA-837198-Original.jpg

Mos.ru is not the proper copyright holder for this photo, RIA Novosti works are copyrighted: [1] Quick1984 (talk) 17:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The user agreement for the use of materials from official Moscow websites mentions a license. RIA Novosti, in turn, is a content supplier for Russian government websites - among them kremlin.ru, government.ru and so on. The official website of the mayor and government of Moscow is also one of them. Their press offices then obtain the sources and re-license them, publishing them in a lower resolution than the originals. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Kultur Kongresszentrum Montforthaus, Feldkirch

There is no FoP for interior views in Austria. The architect is still alive and Austria has a standard of life + 70 years

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber Paradise Chronicle, wenn Du vom österreichichen Recht keine Ahnung hast, dann lass es einfach sein, Löschanträge zu stellen. Selbstverständlich gibt es in Österreich ein sehr umfassendes FoP für öffentiche Gebäude inkl. der Einrichtung darin. Dieser Löschantrag ist also Unsinn. Bitte informiere Dich zuerst.

Dear Paradise Chronicle, sorry, you have no idea from the Austrian law. Of course, there is a very comprehensive FoP for open buildings in Austria including the interior. So this application for extinguishing is nonsense. Please inform yourself first. SG, Asurnipal (talk) 04:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copy paste from FoP Austria: (not ok) for interiors of buildings, including churches, museums, and theatres. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, after a short research I have seen that in Austria it seems to be allowed to also take photographs from the inside. Found it here, but I'd like to understand why the phrase above is placed prominently in FoP Austria. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was there because of blogs like this? There it says it is not allowed to take photographs of the interiors on private grounds... Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand, this building is owned by the city of Feldkirch and publicly accessible as an event center. On the other hand, this is also not correct with the private buildings. Private buildings (e.g. private museums) can also be photographed inside in Austria if they are freely open to the public and this is not expressly prohibited. And there are also other exceptions for private buildings. BR Asurnipal (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Mainz

These 1921 emergency banknotes of the city of Mainz, Germany, are signed P. T. Kessler on the lower right. That is the artist who drew them, German archaeologist and draftsman Peter T(haddäus) Keßler (1869–1957). The other names on the lower right, E. M. Mayer, E. Herzog, and Ph. v. Zabern, are printing/lithography companies active in Mainz at the time that presumably produced the notes.

As Keßler died in 1957, his works are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2028.

Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meines Wissens sind diese Abbildungen gemeinfrei und ich bitte sehr, dem Massenlöschantrag nicht stattzugeben. -- Spurzem (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, sie sind nicht gemeinfrei. Der Urheber ist 1957 gestorben, seine Werke sind daher in Deutschland noch bis Ende 2027 geschützt. Und Wikimedia Commons will nur freie Medien (Commons:Licensing/de).

File:Manuela Ventura 2017.png

perchè la foto non è autorizzata dal soggetto raffigurato Bigmabig (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)— Bigmabig (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep, screenshot from a video released under CC BY licence. The video is not a derivative work, and the uploader is, as per links in the video description (1, 2), a professional videomaker, a camera operator and a video editor. The pic belongs to a public event, so I do not see any potential privacy-related issue. Side note, the video has been online for 6.5 years, so if the subject had been opposed to it, she would probably have challenged the lawfulness of the video with the relevant uploader during this period. Cavarrone (talk) 20:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Preetz

These 1921 emergency banknotes issued by the town of Preetz, Germany, are the work of German artist de:Arthur Goetting. As Goetting died in 1975, his works are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2046.

Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Ein Löschgrund für die Abbildung eines über hundert Jahre alten Geldscheins ist nicht ersichtlich. Deshalb bitte ich sehr, dem Massenlöschantrag nicht stattzugeben. -- Spurzem (talk) 15:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doch, natürlich ist ein Löschgrund ersichtlich: Der Urheber ist 1975 gestorben, seine Werke sind daher in Deutschland noch bis Ende 2045 geschützt. Und Wikimedia Commons will nur freie Medien (Commons:Licensing/de). --Rosenzweig τ 16:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jennifer padjemi women pop festival 1308314.jpg

The person never gave the permission to be taken photograph at the event. Vickyjeynn (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, qui est Vickyjeynn ? Je suppose qu'il faut une certaine légitimité pour demander une suppression de photographie pour une personne, à la place d'une personne. Bien cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 08:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

C'est la personne qui le demande.

Elle invoque son droit à l'image, ce sans autorisation préalable.

Cordialement 2A01:E0A:DD1:7400:5910:730:E1F0:E3B3 21:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je pense que la personne qui déciderait de supprimer l'image a besoin d'être sûre de l'identité du demandeur, ici deux adresses différentes, deux personnes différentes ? Les personnes photographiées lors de cet événement sont des personnes publiques dans le cadre d'une manifestation publique, sur scène. Bien cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 07:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chico Forti Surf Club Mondello.jpg

This work is not in the public domain in the United States because its copyright in the U.S. was restored by the URAA as it was still copyrighted in its source country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 in most cases). It is therefore still copyrighted in the U.S. until 95 years after the year it was initially published (or until 2047 in some circumstances). Holapaco77 (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sono l'autore della foto in oggetto, distribuita liberamente per dare supporto alla causa di Chico Forti. Ho visto che Alamy vende la foto per fini commerciali senza consenso (https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-chico-forti-surf-club-mondello-139545560.html?imageid=C44EFA7C-7785-46F2-B017-5E3D7D98065E&p=699200&pn=1&searchId=17abe9f2fdffd484c03dc4a048a103c6&searchtype=0). Come posso tutelare la proprietà? Ovviamente sono in possesso dell'originale che è orizzontale e comprende un altro soggetto. Batufree (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Batufree: All images on commons must have a free license (which includes the possibility of economic reuse). If you really are the author of the photo, and you do not allow economic reuse, that is a reason more to delete this photo that cannot remain on commons.--Holapaco77 (talk) 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minatoyama Station 20240519 (4).jpg

撮影者を特定される恐れがあるため。 CT-May (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DJ Chase World (talk · contribs)

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, VRT required https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gleina.jpg

Wenn Gleina kein Wappen führt, was bedeutet dann diese Datei? Eine Erfindung (out of scope)? Steht diese wegen unklarer Herkunft außerdem unter verdächtigen Urheberrechtsumständen? GerritR (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs)

COM:PACKAGING

Roy17 (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs)

1981 bookcover

File:神笔.jpg

Roy17 (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs)

music quite certainly not owned by china news service and hence not free.

RZuo (talk) 23:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big nose man，Antelope Canyon，Arizona (53518528854).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 23:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image passed now as {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} per Geo Swan Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicago Grand Park (53334071161).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image passed on a {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} license. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicago night view (53334096441).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Image passed on a {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} license. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forks of Credit provincial park Ontario Canada (53278108222).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Geo Swan as no license because there is a robot out there that thinks it is authorized to over-ride my informed human judgement. I explicitly added a {{PDMark-owner}}. In my opinion no robot should over-ride an informed human judgement. Geo Swan (talk) 23:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/19

May 19

Files uploaded by Nokia621 (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Hedimin (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:USS Pickaway (APA-222) log books

Files in Category:Interior of the Kunstmuseum Stuttgart

Files uploaded by Ssimbaa (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:1958 in Trier

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Георгий Долгопский (talk · contribs)

Files in Category:Kultur Kongresszentrum Montforthaus, Feldkirch

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Mainz

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Preetz

Files uploaded by DJ Chase World (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs)

Files uploaded by Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs)

Navigation menu

Search